From: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
To: Alexander Kanavin <alex.kanavin@gmail.com>
Cc: mns@gomspace.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [OE-core] Issues enabling systemd template service using WantedBy construct (Styhead -> Walnascar)
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 23:38:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDaFSOfqodNDGXUV@heinlein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANNYZj_Fs1-_RHJgojgKPkobKe1eOCK4iwWGSXf+b1kuYr8O=Q@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1873 bytes --]
On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 02:19:14PM +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2025 at 14:12, Martin Siegumfeldt via
> lists.openembedded.org <mns=gomspace.com@lists.openembedded.org>
> wrote:
>
> > As mentioned, it appears to be a regression during the styhead -> walnascar development. I notice that the systemctl-native is now built from the systemd sources - is this correct? Should I consequently report this through systemd?
>
> Yes, we've transitioned to using systemd's implementation rather than our own.
>
I'm running into this same problem and I think there is a serious flaw
with walnascar / master. We are using IPKs and what is happening is
that the `postinst` is not running correctly. The `systemd_postinst` is
where all of the unit files are enabled (based on the SYSTEMD_SERVICE
variable). If this doesn't run correctly, the image is missing all of
the default enabled services and templates.
The `systemd_postinst` has a guard "if systemctl >/dev/null 2>/dev/null"
and if this fails, none of the unit file enable code is ran. The thing
is, `systemctl` will always fail because it by default is the same thing
as `systemctl list-units`, which needs to access the systemd bus
connection.
I modified systemd.bbclass as follows:
```
systemd_postinst() {
+systemctl || echo "It failed for some reason"
if systemctl >/dev/null 2>/dev/null; then
OPTS=""
```
After this, my `log.do_rootfs` is full of:
```
Failed to connect to system scope bus via local transport: Operation not permitted (consider using --machine=<user>@.host --user to connect to bus of other user)
It failed for some reason
```
I think there needs to be some change in systemd_postinst to run
something other than the equivalent of `systemctl list-units` to
determine if the executable is valid.
--
Patrick Williams
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-28 3:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-12 12:12 Issues enabling systemd template service using WantedBy construct (Styhead -> Walnascar) Martin Siegumfeldt
2025-05-12 12:19 ` [OE-core] " Alexander Kanavin
2025-05-28 3:38 ` Patrick Williams [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDaFSOfqodNDGXUV@heinlein \
--to=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
--cc=alex.kanavin@gmail.com \
--cc=mns@gomspace.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.