From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6DDC3ABB2 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 13:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9B93C7615 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 15:35:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (in-7.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90BD53C6717 for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 15:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-7.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1D54200CEF for ; Wed, 28 May 2025 15:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A541F79C; Wed, 28 May 2025 13:34:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1748439297; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HL6162Os6GIHcvsjLb2m+lMfDrXf3CyntMgA7D6/P6k=; b=I6FoEkpVeLkqEjOTncMUATS3HxHwrY0pvG2Fj9T6OVaaf3iIWVVUxhwqD8vC+QXnb00Drc bUF11hrtVJAtbmGlvuLmY74o2mpKX9Ux3sXna5fYF2VM8n5fOiO5+LY9vwo5321UmkYdlw CY+snxSWxm5HzZb8cTtZbPacsjtHrtU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1748439297; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HL6162Os6GIHcvsjLb2m+lMfDrXf3CyntMgA7D6/P6k=; b=bzItVDTcWcoHup1FMFmuHuFZ3+z81r7/v32tmeWYPnh4gT9uNTW6N+CQdkLE/AWW8QsVJG I0VlRzCjWrT+pnAQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=I6FoEkpV; dkim=pass header.d=suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=bzItVDTc DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1748439297; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HL6162Os6GIHcvsjLb2m+lMfDrXf3CyntMgA7D6/P6k=; b=I6FoEkpVeLkqEjOTncMUATS3HxHwrY0pvG2Fj9T6OVaaf3iIWVVUxhwqD8vC+QXnb00Drc bUF11hrtVJAtbmGlvuLmY74o2mpKX9Ux3sXna5fYF2VM8n5fOiO5+LY9vwo5321UmkYdlw CY+snxSWxm5HzZb8cTtZbPacsjtHrtU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1748439297; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=HL6162Os6GIHcvsjLb2m+lMfDrXf3CyntMgA7D6/P6k=; b=bzItVDTcWcoHup1FMFmuHuFZ3+z81r7/v32tmeWYPnh4gT9uNTW6N+CQdkLE/AWW8QsVJG I0VlRzCjWrT+pnAQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F077136E3; Wed, 28 May 2025 13:34:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 3y62EQERN2grPAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 28 May 2025 13:34:57 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 15:35:25 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 60A541F79C X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.51 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RBL_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; SPAMHAUS_XBL(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97:from]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167:received]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.cz:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:dkim, suse.cz:email, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:rdns, imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-7.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [RFC] Reduce .runtime for Long-Running Tests ? X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: LTP List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > After reviewing some LTP HTML test reports, I noticed that the ten tests > alone take nearly 20 minutes to complete. For example: > = > -------------------- > bind06 300.15s > msgstress01 180.44s Isn't this better after: commit e3b85e50471b3892316a2b2c7c730e9dc8d9139e Author: Ricardo B. Marli=E8re Date: Wed May 21 05:31:12 2025 -0300 syscalls/msgstress01: Set upper bound for num_messages > fsx22 170.47s > pty07 150.04s > pty06 150.02s > gf18 121.09s > gf17 120.82s > gf16 120.13s > dirtyc0w_shmem 120.11s > setsockopt07 76.47s As Peter pointed out, most of these are fuzzy sync tests and the runtime is callibrated in order to get reasonable chance of reproducing the results. But indeed the runtime does not scale with the speed of the machine and we are not setting the pair exec_loops in the tests that run for so long, so I suppose that callibrating the number of loops for these tests that does not make the bug less reproducible would make things better. -- = Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- = Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp