From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm, slab: use frozen pages for large kmalloc
Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 15:46:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDiBUr38QArXjO6v@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529-frozen-pages-for-large-kmalloc-v1-1-b3aa52a8fa17@suse.cz>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:56:26AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> Since slab pages are now frozen, it makes sense to have large kmalloc()
> objects behave same as small kmalloc(), as the choice between the two is
> an implementation detail depending on allocation size.
>
> Notably, increasing refcount on a slab page containing kmalloc() object
> is not possible anymore, so it should be consistent for large kmalloc
> pages.
>
> Therefore, change large kmalloc to use the frozen pages API.
>
> Because of some unexpected fallout in the slab pages case (see commit
> b9c0e49abfca ("mm: decline to manipulate the refcount on a slab page"),
> implement the same kind of checks and warnings as part of this change.
>
> Notably, networking code using sendpage_ok() to determine whether the
> page refcount can be manipulated in the network stack should continue
> behaving correctly. Before this change, the function returns true for
> large kmalloc pages and page refcount can be manipulated. After this
> change, the function will return false.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index bf55206935c467f7508e863332063bb15f904a24..d3eb6adf9fa949fbd611470182a03c743b16aac7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1549,6 +1549,8 @@ static inline void get_page(struct page *page)
> struct folio *folio = page_folio(page);
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_slab(folio)))
> return;
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(folio_test_large_kmalloc(folio)))
> + return;
> folio_get(folio);
I guess eventually we can convert them to VM_WARN_ON_ONCE()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-29 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-29 8:56 [PATCH 0/2] frozen pages for large kmalloc Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-29 8:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm, slab: use " Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-29 15:46 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2025-05-30 16:59 ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-05-30 4:17 ` Harry Yoo
2025-05-29 8:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm, slab: support NUMA policy " Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-29 14:57 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-05-29 15:59 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-30 19:05 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2025-06-02 8:24 ` Vlastimil Babka
2025-05-30 7:11 ` Harry Yoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDiBUr38QArXjO6v@google.com \
--to=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.