From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net [216.105.38.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1549C5AE59 for ; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 00:26:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.sourceforge.net; s=beta; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc: List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id: Subject:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:To:From:Date:Sender: Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender :Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=09pVby1P5OH7MT1k4Ob1ZU5xyGpRHbGMFtS0Yz7iSB0=; b=DnqVYM/eQTXSsiDHdchOdeFV8b eZD8B5YNSYRkO6c9K4fC+b3lPPNTnwPEMwthW17EwngdXJc6tSSsjIWB8fC/7zvxVMrDJsIh8YgX0 /OOnEv0JRHFjTk27pPXTfkohXDwk/cHMxNZyq4zeQLQeU9iH2mBz3sJ252kpndcX5ZmI=; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=sfs-ml-3.v29.lw.sourceforge.com) by sfs-ml-3.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1uLWWz-0007OP-B6; Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:26:29 +0000 Received: from [172.30.29.66] (helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1uLWWx-0007OI-6b for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:26:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sourceforge.net; s=x; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5rMEOV3KLFf+UgtAPaHUd4YMhA+OdnA8tVR26hQhvHY=; b=ipMYUG1VNjzbizXlATCbEmrhKo Fd3bwdTvRI3tog+vrvp0imIvT+y6IyuxAfVPhcdGkhy7tzTmJ/1dQ4lSGUGnGITkWEkzuwwafjVHS kJ4AgSOWK19TuCLKYrIRbdNwdbwrrlOBN67AFnLCn58iviDREY02TE7U52ktjGEvr4gM=; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sf.net; s=x ; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To :From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5rMEOV3KLFf+UgtAPaHUd4YMhA+OdnA8tVR26hQhvHY=; b=i+5UkxC1EZZPwkCPeyPnCkY7Tq VSE8MOGd6BBt82dbbqAKsBgesz6yTjsEaA+JY5RajJDo9h0Dnv06vP0TWx5YFYA6MlcfRmrZ104C1 qVyeSlJjUF+fjDl7DZjyK0gHORmbGhkUpwMwlpBhGubtHNDTkGjU5SjQimJTEuW8apfM=; Received: from casper.infradead.org ([90.155.50.34]) by sfi-mx-2.v28.lw.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.95) id 1uLWWv-0000ki-GW for linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:26:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=5rMEOV3KLFf+UgtAPaHUd4YMhA+OdnA8tVR26hQhvHY=; b=Exm/mE4p4ROy2CB3jVoyT30S5s CZwAD3td2DHQhuXhoNsMlrGr6/4Fu+gZ5ZMxz3isum/jvx6wHBpY/HqfHzfV8O8mVca0YnPZdt0Ii TJUAhCQVf3ONs1apHQXVDwdA6Ki+CaSqyYrYQBREpHRyNGbOWuLG3w0EmHYmCd45IDdeLz7JWpHAB FLns5ip5T1x8h6GjA/YCEPKY0ADhUW2iKpDn/DXGLgnfRH6o/41Dh6L6PMlJ4l2kNcdWNaeQnWMlm 4PTfCEflJTI5RzsbFZWtiB1H08ys0qYjSRqA+4DSIuhNZmLy2gJ9Qm1HjVY9ggkhrfUOA9LJA16NN Ds2tp2tg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uLWWa-0000000HB4K-15Hx; Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:26:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 01:26:04 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: syzbot Message-ID: References: <67b75198.050a0220.14d86d.02e2.GAE@google.com> <683b8ea2.a00a0220.d8eae.0020.GAE@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <683b8ea2.a00a0220.d8eae.0020.GAE@google.com> X-Headers-End: 1uLWWv-0000ki-GW Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in folio_unlock (3) X-BeenThere: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: v9fs@lists.linux.dev, hdanton@sina.com, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, asmadeus@codewreck.org, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, dhowells@redhat.com, netfs@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, hch@lst.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: linux-f2fs-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 04:20:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this issue to: > > commit 80f31d2a7e5f4efa7150c951268236c670bcb068 > Author: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Thu May 8 05:14:32 2025 +0000 That's not possible; this commit is after the original report. That said, there _is_ a double folio_unlock() in this patch, which I'm about to send a fix for. It's just not fixing the original report. _______________________________________________ Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDBF2184E; Sun, 1 Jun 2025 00:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748737584; cv=none; b=exF+f9RhDZGNqKAQec3vnWpYYvIRtIOqwCoDlcvE1Sj34mEP+0IdBl3+hSVhXZMcdwA6SvcmDXyDhXQNdp5v6qXfQ8n2E9hQn8BTI0989jRe2SoIszYpNAirMiH1DEQLFo5923MMeod0U2TIeXgp4+YKnZJNa/SIWw99GCgPnns= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748737584; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wnjlPLdQigk8QgUrIHw5yk6jJrpMJY8IJU4pMMPHFAo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=i26LlqxtT0Tah+IlIFtIWUrN2l59c4D+DTf399S0S+NfsswwVXKYeVLXFqjRNgFwOdgwffCOvNtkofkVDlj4k4X+/kp96IEMnOgFlKPvaeTyO7gu6ZGv43dU53nmrPc4hIo+D/pMBOTD1upbCFYy4TiwV5Xx9RMZrOD85FO4WSs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=Exm/mE4p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="Exm/mE4p" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=5rMEOV3KLFf+UgtAPaHUd4YMhA+OdnA8tVR26hQhvHY=; b=Exm/mE4p4ROy2CB3jVoyT30S5s CZwAD3td2DHQhuXhoNsMlrGr6/4Fu+gZ5ZMxz3isum/jvx6wHBpY/HqfHzfV8O8mVca0YnPZdt0Ii TJUAhCQVf3ONs1apHQXVDwdA6Ki+CaSqyYrYQBREpHRyNGbOWuLG3w0EmHYmCd45IDdeLz7JWpHAB FLns5ip5T1x8h6GjA/YCEPKY0ADhUW2iKpDn/DXGLgnfRH6o/41Dh6L6PMlJ4l2kNcdWNaeQnWMlm 4PTfCEflJTI5RzsbFZWtiB1H08ys0qYjSRqA+4DSIuhNZmLy2gJ9Qm1HjVY9ggkhrfUOA9LJA16NN Ds2tp2tg==; Received: from willy by casper.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uLWWa-0000000HB4K-15Hx; Sun, 01 Jun 2025 00:26:04 +0000 Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 01:26:04 +0100 From: Matthew Wilcox To: syzbot Cc: asmadeus@codewreck.org, chao@kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, hch@lst.de, hdanton@sina.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, jlayton@kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, v9fs@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [syzbot] [netfs?] kernel BUG in folio_unlock (3) Message-ID: References: <67b75198.050a0220.14d86d.02e2.GAE@google.com> <683b8ea2.a00a0220.d8eae.0020.GAE@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfs@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <683b8ea2.a00a0220.d8eae.0020.GAE@google.com> On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 04:20:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote: > syzbot has bisected this issue to: > > commit 80f31d2a7e5f4efa7150c951268236c670bcb068 > Author: Christoph Hellwig > Date: Thu May 8 05:14:32 2025 +0000 That's not possible; this commit is after the original report. That said, there _is_ a double folio_unlock() in this patch, which I'm about to send a fix for. It's just not fixing the original report.