All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Em Sharnoff <sharnoff@neon.tech>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Oleg Vasilev <oleg@neon.tech>,
	Arthur Petukhovsky <arthur@neon.tech>,
	Stefan Radig <stefan@neon.tech>, Misha Sakhnov <misha@neon.tech>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Handle alloc failure in phys_*_init()
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2025 08:36:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEE6_S2a-1tk1dtI@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f4c0972-a123-4cc3-89f2-ed3490371e65@neon.tech>


* Em Sharnoff <sharnoff@neon.tech> wrote:

> tl;dr:
> 
> * When setting up page table mappings for physical addresses after boot,
>   alloc_low_page() uses GFP_ATOMIC, which is allowed to fail.
> * This isn't currently handled, and results in a null pointer
>   dereference when it occurs.
> * This allocation failure can happen during memory hotplug.
> 
> To handle failure, change phys_pud_init() and similar functions to
> return zero if allocation failed (either directly or transitively), and
> convert that to -ENOMEM in arch_add_memory().

> +		/*
> +		 * Bail only after updating pgd/p4d to keep progress from p4d across retries.
> +		 */
> +		if (!paddr_last)
> +			return 0;
> +
>  		pgd_changed = true;

> -	init_memory_mapping(start, start + size, params->pgprot);
> +	if (!init_memory_mapping(start, start + size, params->pgprot))
> +		return -ENOMEM;

I agree that it makes total sense to fix all this (especially since you 
are actively triggering it), but have you tried also changing it away 
from GFP_ATOMIC? There's no real reason why it should be GFP_ATOMIC 
AFAICS, other than some historic inertia that nobody bothered to fix.

Plus, could you please change the return flow from this zero 
special-case over to something like ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM) and IS_ERR()?

*Technically* zero is a valid physical address, although we 
intentionally never use it in the kernel AFAIK and wouldn't ever put a 
page table there either. ERR_PTR()/IS_ERR() is much easier on the eyes 
than the zero special-case.

Finally, could you make this a 2-patch fix series: first one to fix the 
error return path to not crash, and the second one to change it away 
from GFP_ATOMIC?

Thanks,

	Ingo


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-05  6:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-04 18:59 [PATCH] x86/mm: Handle alloc failure in phys_*_init() Em Sharnoff
2025-06-05  6:36 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-06-05  6:41   ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-06-05  6:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-06-09 10:36   ` Em Sharnoff

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEE6_S2a-1tk1dtI@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=arthur@neon.tech \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=misha@neon.tech \
    --cc=oleg@neon.tech \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=sharnoff@neon.tech \
    --cc=stefan@neon.tech \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.