Re: [PATCH net v3] macsec: MACsec SCI assignment for ES = 0

[Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@marvell.com>]

On 2025-06-05 at 13:21:04, Carlos Fernandez (carlos.fernandez@technica-engineering.de) wrote:
> Hi Sundeep, 
> 
> In order to test this scenario, ES and SC flags must be 0 and 
> port identifier should be different than 1.
> 
> In order to test it, I runned the following commands that configure
> two network interfaces on qemu over different namespaces.
> 
> After applying this configuration, MACsec ping works in the patched version 
> but fails with the original code.
> 
> I'll paste the script commands here. Hope it helps your testing.
> 
> PORT=11
> SEND_SCI="off"
> ETH1_MAC="52:54:00:12:34:57"
> ETH0_MAC="52:54:00:12:34:56"
> ENCRYPT="on"
> 
> ip netns add macsec1
> ip netns add macsec0
> ip link set eth0 netns macsec0
> ip link set eth1 netns macsec1
>   
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip link add link eth0 macsec0 type macsec port $PORT send_sci $SEND_SCI end_station off encrypt $ENCRYPT
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip macsec add macsec0 tx sa 0 pn 2 on key 01 12345678901234567890123456789012
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip macsec add macsec0 rx port $PORT address $ETH1_MAC 
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip macsec add macsec0 rx port $PORT address $ETH1_MAC sa 0 pn 2 on key 02 09876543210987654321098765432109
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip link set dev macsec0 up
> ip netns exec macsec0 ip addr add 10.10.12.1/24 dev macsec0
> 
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip link add link eth1 macsec1 type macsec port $PORT send_sci $SEND_SCI end_station off encrypt $ENCRYPT
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip macsec add macsec1 tx sa 0 pn 2 on key 02 09876543210987654321098765432109
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip macsec add macsec1 rx port $PORT address $ETH0_MAC 
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip macsec add macsec1 rx port $PORT address $ETH0_MAC sa 0 pn 2 on key 01 12345678901234567890123456789012
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip link set dev macsec1 up
> ip netns exec macsec1 ip addr add 10.10.12.2/24 dev macsec1
> 
> ip netns exec macsec1 ping 10.10.12.1 #Ping works on patched version.
> 
> Thanks, 
> Carlos

Clear for me now. Thanks for the steps.

Sundeep