From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E93C5AD49 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:16:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5803C9AFF for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 12:16:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (in-4.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1FC3C9ACC for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 12:15:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (smtp-out2.suse.de [195.135.223.131]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-4.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931D510004AB for ; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 12:15:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 920B01F38E; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:15:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1749204941; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CTx7f9cOwWq+b8tD/1DHVVASWj4P1UTHKq1SL/9bbcY=; b=NOZ4T4CWweNXg77kb5uiXCsyT6rohmlK1WGsnt/FVxcXykEcegTxCs2sAUhfVmDw5YFXg/ Qzh8lTjTESpa7cedLo8MjGCJqAGSoCKT9H9MVScoF40rqtLExixdqo8nsMs672WMYrh0NK nDQB7HjE+XputDBB9yko8vkrmVCRAqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1749204941; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CTx7f9cOwWq+b8tD/1DHVVASWj4P1UTHKq1SL/9bbcY=; b=8E2RFyGBLLiv87B37IYwARQqVfy+shqjAwtH2DG6xle4XzByP9eVoMUu2SXfWqR6sLSoS1 bj9fqjXDMlkh8EAg== Authentication-Results: smtp-out2.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1749204941; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CTx7f9cOwWq+b8tD/1DHVVASWj4P1UTHKq1SL/9bbcY=; b=NOZ4T4CWweNXg77kb5uiXCsyT6rohmlK1WGsnt/FVxcXykEcegTxCs2sAUhfVmDw5YFXg/ Qzh8lTjTESpa7cedLo8MjGCJqAGSoCKT9H9MVScoF40rqtLExixdqo8nsMs672WMYrh0NK nDQB7HjE+XputDBB9yko8vkrmVCRAqY= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1749204941; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CTx7f9cOwWq+b8tD/1DHVVASWj4P1UTHKq1SL/9bbcY=; b=8E2RFyGBLLiv87B37IYwARQqVfy+shqjAwtH2DG6xle4XzByP9eVoMUu2SXfWqR6sLSoS1 bj9fqjXDMlkh8EAg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1121369F; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 10:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id hk48Hc2/QmjoKwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Fri, 06 Jun 2025 10:15:41 +0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 12:16:09 +0200 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Li Wang Message-ID: References: <20250605120702.213048-1-liwang@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.30 / 50.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.cz:email,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.7 at in-4.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] tst_atomic: drop legacy inline assembly and use __atomic or __sync builtins X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > Or, do you think it's necessary to define a dedicated tst_atomic_t type, > such as: > typedef int32_t tst_atomic_t; > and use it explicitly for all variables that are subject to atomic > operations? > > This way, we can clearly declare which values are intended for atomic use, > improving type safety and code clarity. Sounds good to me. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp