From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2025 20:44:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aELixaeTRl+BcfcH@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250605192643.533502-3-seanjc@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 12:26:42PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>Verify that SPEC_CTRL can be read when it should exist, #GPs on all reads
>and writes does not exist, and that various bits can be set when they're
>supported.
>
>Opportunistically define more AMD mitigation features.
>
>Cc: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>---
> lib/x86/msr.h | 8 ++++++--
> lib/x86/processor.h | 9 +++++++--
> x86/msr.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/lib/x86/msr.h b/lib/x86/msr.h
>index ccfd6bdd..cc4cb855 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/msr.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/msr.h
>@@ -32,8 +32,12 @@
> #define EFER_FFXSR (1<<_EFER_FFXSR)
>
> /* Intel MSRs. Some also available on other CPUs */
>-#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>-#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
>+#define MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL 0x00000048
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_IBRS BIT(0)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_STIBP BIT(1)
>+#define SPEC_CTRL_SSBD BIT(2)
>+
>+#define MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD 0x00000049
> #define PRED_CMD_IBPB BIT(0)
>
> #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b
>diff --git a/lib/x86/processor.h b/lib/x86/processor.h
>index 9e3659d4..cbfaa018 100644
>--- a/lib/x86/processor.h
>+++ b/lib/x86/processor.h
>@@ -288,13 +288,13 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LA57 X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 16)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPID X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 22)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SHSTK X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 7)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
> #define X86_FEATURE_IBT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 20)
> #define X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 26)
> #define X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 28)
> #define X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 29)
>-#define X86_FEATURE_PKS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, ECX, 31)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 0, EDX, 31)
nit: looks adding a tab after "#define" is the convention in this file
> #define X86_FEATURE_LAM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x7, 1, EAX, 26)
>-
> /*
> * KVM defined leafs
> */
>@@ -312,6 +312,11 @@ struct x86_cpu_feature {
> #define X86_FEATURE_LM X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000001, 0, EDX, 29)
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDPRU X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 4)
> #define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 12)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 14)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 15)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 17)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS_SAME_MODE X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 19)
>+#define X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x80000008, 0, EBX, 24)
ditto
> #define X86_FEATURE_NPT X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 0)
> #define X86_FEATURE_LBRV X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 1)
> #define X86_FEATURE_NRIPS X86_CPU_FEATURE(0x8000000A, 0, EDX, 3)
>diff --git a/x86/msr.c b/x86/msr.c
>index ac12d127..ca265fac 100644
>--- a/x86/msr.c
>+++ b/x86/msr.c
>@@ -290,10 +290,37 @@ static void test_x2apic_msrs(void)
> __test_x2apic_msrs(true);
> }
>
>-static void test_cmd_msrs(void)
>+static void test_mitigation_msrs(void)
> {
>+ u64 spec_ctrl_bits = 0, val;
> int i;
>
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBRS))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_IBRS;
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_STIBP;
CPUID.(EAX=07H, ECX=0):EDX[26] enumerates IBRS and IBPB support, but it doesn't
enumerate STIBP support. EDX[27] does.
Aside from this, the patch looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
>+
>+ if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SSBD) || this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
>+ spec_ctrl_bits |= SPEC_CTRL_SSBD;
>+
>+ if (spec_ctrl_bits) {
>+ for (val = 0; val <= spec_ctrl_bits; val++) {
>+ /*
>+ * Test only values that are guaranteed not to fault,
>+ * virtualization of SPEC_CTRL has myriad holes that
>+ * won't be ever closed.
>+ */
>+ if ((val & spec_ctrl_bits) != val)
>+ continue;
>+
>+ test_msr_rw(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", val);
>+ }
>+ } else {
>+ test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL");
>+ test_wrmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, "SPEC_CTRL", 0);
>+ }
>+
> test_rdmsr_fault(MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD, "PRED_CMD");
> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL) ||
> this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_IBPB) ||
>@@ -332,7 +359,7 @@ int main(int ac, char **av)
> test_misc_msrs();
> test_mce_msrs();
> test_x2apic_msrs();
>- test_cmd_msrs();
>+ test_mitigation_msrs();
> }
>
> return report_summary();
>--
>2.50.0.rc0.604.gd4ff7b7c86-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-06 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-05 19:26 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 1/3] x86/msr: Treat PRED_CMD as support if CPU has SBPB Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 2/3] x86/msr: Add a testcase to verify SPEC_CTRL exists (or not) as expected Sean Christopherson
2025-06-06 12:44 ` Chao Gao [this message]
2025-06-06 22:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-06-05 19:26 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 3/3] x86/msr: Add an "msr64" test configuration to validate negative cases Sean Christopherson
2025-06-25 22:25 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 0/3] x86/msr: Add SPEC_CTRL coverage Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aELixaeTRl+BcfcH@intel.com \
--to=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.