All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	yang@os.amperecomputing.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] arm64: Restrict pagetable teardown to avoid false warning
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:37:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEhfY2D-njOEBFst@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250527082633.61073-1-dev.jain@arm.com>

On Tue, May 27, 2025 at 01:56:33PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> Commit 9c006972c3fe removes the pxd_present() checks because the caller
> checks pxd_present(). But, in case of vmap_try_huge_pud(), the caller only
> checks pud_present(); pud_free_pmd_page() recurses on each pmd through
> pmd_free_pte_page(), wherein the pmd may be none. Thus it is possible to
> hit a warning in the latter, since pmd_none => !pmd_table(). Thus, add
> a pmd_present() check in pud_free_pmd_page().
> 
> This problem was found by code inspection.
> 
> Fixes: 9c006972c3fe (arm64: mmu: drop pXd_present() checks from pXd_free_pYd_table())
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>

Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-10 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-27  8:26 [PATCH v3] arm64: Restrict pagetable teardown to avoid false warning Dev Jain
2025-05-29  9:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-29  9:13   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-29  9:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-05-30  3:55 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-30  7:05   ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-10 16:37 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-06-12 17:27 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEhfY2D-njOEBFst@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.