From: "Cabiddu, Giovanni" <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>, <bhelgaas@google.com>,
<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: <mario.limonciello@amd.com>, <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
<huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>, <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <mike.ximing.chen@intel.com>,
<ahsan.atta@intel.com>, <suman.kumar.chakraborty@intel.com>,
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: Explicitly put devices into D0 when initializing - Bug report
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 13:52:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEl8J3kv6HAcAkUp@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424043232.1848107-1-superm1@kernel.org>
Hi Mario, Bjorn and Alex,
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:31:32PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>
> AMD BIOS team has root caused an issue that NVME storage failed to come
> back from suspend to a lack of a call to _REG when NVME device was probed.
>
> commit 112a7f9c8edbf ("PCI/ACPI: Call _REG when transitioning D-states")
> added support for calling _REG when transitioning D-states, but this only
> works if the device actually "transitions" D-states.
>
> commit 967577b062417 ("PCI/PM: Keep runtime PM enabled for unbound PCI
> devices") added support for runtime PM on PCI devices, but never actually
> 'explicitly' sets the device to D0.
>
> To make sure that devices are in D0 and that platform methods such as
> _REG are called, explicitly set all devices into D0 during initialization.
>
> Fixes: 967577b062417 ("PCI/PM: Keep runtime PM enabled for unbound PCI devices")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
Through a bisect, we identified that this patch, in v6.16-rc1,
introduces a regression on vfio-pci across all Intel QuickAssist (QAT)
devices. Specifically, the ioctl VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD call fails
with -EACCES.
Upon further investigation, the -EACCES appears to originate from the
rpm_resume() function, which is called by pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
within vfio_pci_core_enable(). Here is the exact call trace:
drivers/base/power/runtime.c: rpm_resume()
drivers/base/power/runtime.c: __pm_runtime_resume()
include/linux/pm_runtime.h: pm_runtime_resume_and_get()
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c: vfio_pci_core_enable()
drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c: vfio_pci_open_device()
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c: device->ops->open_device()
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c: vfio_df_device_first_open()
drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c: vfio_df_open()
drivers/vfio/group.c: vfio_df_group_open()
drivers/vfio/group.c: vfio_device_open_file()
drivers/vfio/group.c: vfio_group_ioctl_get_device_fd()
drivers/vfio/group.c: vfio_group_fops_unl_ioctl(..., VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD, ...)
Is this a known issue that affects other devices? Is there any ongoing
discussion or fix in progress?
Thanks,
--
Giovanni
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 4:31 [PATCH v2] PCI: Explicitly put devices into D0 when initializing Mario Limonciello
2025-04-24 15:07 ` Wysocki, Rafael J
2025-04-24 18:20 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-04-27 12:54 ` Denis Benato
2025-05-05 19:20 ` Perry, David
2025-05-05 20:01 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-05-05 23:06 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-11 14:14 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2025-06-11 14:56 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-11 16:05 ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-11 12:52 ` Cabiddu, Giovanni [this message]
2025-06-11 13:50 ` [PATCH v2] PCI: Explicitly put devices into D0 when initializing - Bug report Mario Limonciello
2025-06-11 14:30 ` Cabiddu, Giovanni
2025-06-11 16:00 ` Alex Williamson
2025-06-11 16:13 ` Cabiddu, Giovanni
2025-06-11 20:45 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-11 22:07 ` Giovanni Cabiddu
2025-06-19 9:11 ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aEl8J3kv6HAcAkUp@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=ahsan.atta@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mike.ximing.chen@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=suman.kumar.chakraborty@intel.com \
--cc=superm1@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.