From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A836AC677C4 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1011794.1390315 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uPM9h-0003rT-SZ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:17 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1011794.1390315; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uPM9h-0003rM-PX; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:17 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1011794; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:16 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uPM9g-0003rD-2R for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:16 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uPM9f-00DoSS-0U; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:15 +0000 Received: from lfbn-gre-1-199-136.w90-112.abo.wanadoo.fr ([90.112.161.136] helo=l14) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1uPM9e-002i7t-2l; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:10:15 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xenproject.org; s=20200302mail; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=aRVxHnIoORT4t1BZRJh7GplGMdL05IknANQPk/Da1YI=; b=kTUFQBn/3E03zQL+XEwvKmb/aG 47/eiiVYUNE0MzX9M9oxuF5xUqJst0SyjKauQMwJUThQ6DddZV0kRecUG0QBoV9bvyRHabWJ6sJVc yq+zoMQc/PgeSEFkVUHRODudCjRqWugO9XPp3cPPs79qUjBXsvmePAfFeNsMWVbL1ogQ=; Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 16:10:12 +0200 From: Anthony PERARD To: Stewart Hildebrand Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross , Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tools/arm: exclude iomem from domU extended regions Message-ID: References: <20250609183438.178214-1-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com> <20250609183438.178214-3-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250609183438.178214-3-stewart.hildebrand@amd.com> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 02:34:33PM -0400, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: > When a device is passed through to a xl domU, the iomem ranges may > overlap with the extended regions. Remove iomem from extended regions. > > Signed-off-by: Stewart Hildebrand Reviewed-by: Anthony PERARD Thanks, -- Anthony PERARD