All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, ardb@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
	james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	scott@os.amperecomputing.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] arm64/Kconfig: add LSUI Kconfig
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:48:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEmXNw01W6IosBXt@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07190b99-5e8c-4de0-b460-248ec39996f4@sirena.org.uk>

Hi Mark,

> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 11:49:12AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
>
> > +menu "v9.6 architectural features"
> > +
> > +config AS_HAS_LSUI
> > +	def_bool $(as-instr,.arch_extension lsui)
> > +
> > +endmenu # "v9.6 architectural features"
> > +
>
> This is adding a menu with no user selectable options, does that not
> result in a confusing user experience?We do often add toolchain
> feature checks inside the menus but that's usually associated with
> hiding a user selectable option, if there isn't one (or any other option
> for that arch version yet) we should probably put the check elsewhere.

Well even the v9.4 menu can be printed a menu with no user selcatable
optoins when UPROBE is enabled (ARM64_GCS depend on !UPROBE).
But without any selectable options adding the menu seems weird as you said.

Like AS_HAS_MOPS, let me define AS_HAS_LSUI without menu.
I'll remove the menu entry.

Thanks.

--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-11 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-11 10:49 [PATCH 0/6] support FEAT_LSUI and apply it on futex atomic ops Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] arm64: cpufeature: add FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 13:29   ` Mark Brown
2025-06-11 14:52     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 15:16   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-11 17:55     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] arm64/Kconfig: add LSUI Kconfig Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 13:34   ` Mark Brown
2025-06-11 14:48     ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-06-11 15:17   ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-11 17:54     ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-12  6:33       ` Marc Zyngier
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm64/futex: move futex atomic logic with clearing PAN bit Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm64/futex: add futex atomic operation with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64/asm: introduce lsui.h Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-11 10:49 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64/futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEmXNw01W6IosBXt@e129823.arm.com \
    --to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.