From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F6B223338 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749675452; cv=none; b=kiZyiQJxG7XPEsTF47Zck18zH8XrWAuVaNXebq8NeuNGuDOOtZwCP/YFz8Dkx/LIx1+N6c6etLNgXMN0vznk3AbyyTCZVUPqVBFkt6JwqFB+kSPaQ4xD45aICgmIYWk+CllT63XUSUFh1oc/Q+MnZRCD7XCaFrJJbXUdVvHf1/A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749675452; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0SYKc89+ujYfKWoibjSuje0HzopRlgfCFwPiSciF2jA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HjTnJu3R2NqYt1JxYJ1uwX2oGCkYgfg8PQWuNCzKLR9LAQfg7hXm3tXv48HCvjVfhIaIYBRnx8hM9Ti3iC/AUORM1UpXe50blDMihg4oWzXq/XORcNLWfMHHzWBEjp6v/iR7zq0HAsU2MGs5zogZHVMvsVa33r1GaaunhCuFtPs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=P2O7EgIw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="P2O7EgIw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA99FC4CEE3; Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:57:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1749675451; bh=0SYKc89+ujYfKWoibjSuje0HzopRlgfCFwPiSciF2jA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=P2O7EgIwwQF/zJb1mAYQ8rOdHOVfKcLacTYOtWQ4wGgOE+Op+wwoKYwogW0PxRD0l qPFm9T1QordD04KzTDEYQs9KZ8S0F796L31/3cKYyECdY011/CKuMzZCwcN9h+JWjh cbAFWn4//56kOOCtgWnuNELjUkQj7l3I1d93gwoKR3nKOK/OD64Yy/IVLmr+3wIWu1 qRQK89qt4S+Qr+uVvwr0fdsWicdNdaV07tP2EGVXdsMb7kO0yV7TmR+YpiOzxvoqip F643jmLN852q7VkK58FesQw5OFQJ98PS2UpN+i6GQ+SJ4Py7wvS/jReVArjRZNt3cU KBZz9xFz7Ushw== Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 10:57:29 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Marco Crivellari Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lai Jiangshan , Thomas Gleixner , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Michal Hocko Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] Workqueue: add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq Message-ID: References: <20250611131438.651493-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com> <20250611131438.651493-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250611131438.651493-2-marco.crivellari@suse.com> On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 03:14:30PM +0200, Marco Crivellari wrote: > -extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq; > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_wq; /* use system_percpu_wq, this will be removed */ > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_percpu_wq; > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_highpri_wq; > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_long_wq; > extern struct workqueue_struct *system_unbound_wq; > +extern struct workqueue_struct *system_dfl_wq; This patch is just adding the extern decls. Shouldn't these be created? Thanks. -- tejun