Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] i2c: tegra: make reset an optional property

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 02:57:36AM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:

...

> > +static int tegra_i2c_master_reset(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > +{
> > +	if (!i2c_dev->hw->has_mst_reset)
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +
> > +	i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0x1, I2C_MASTER_RESET_CNTRL);
> > +	udelay(2);
> > +
> > +	i2c_writel(i2c_dev, 0x0, I2C_MASTER_RESET_CNTRL);
> > +	udelay(2);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int tegra_i2c_init(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >  {
> >  	u32 val, clk_divisor, clk_multiplier, tsu_thd, tlow, thigh, non_hs_mode;
> > @@ -621,8 +641,10 @@ static int tegra_i2c_init(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >  	 */
> >  	if (handle)
> >  		err = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_RST", NULL, NULL);
> > -	else
> > +	else if (i2c_dev->rst)
> >  		err = reset_control_reset(i2c_dev->rst);
> > +	else
> > +		err = tegra_i2c_master_reset(i2c_dev);
> 
> Can you please take a look here? Should the reset happen in ACPI?

This is a good question. Without seeing all the implementations of _RST method
for the platforms based on this SoC it's hard to say. Ideally the _RST (which
is called above) must handle it properly, but firmwares have bugs...

TL;DR: I think the approach is correct, and if any bug in ACPI will be found,
the workaround (quirk) needs to be added here later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko