All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: <kevin.tian@intel.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<joro@8bytes.org>, <ddutile@redhat.com>, <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	<peterz@infradead.org>, <jsnitsel@redhat.com>, <praan@google.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
	<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/12] iommufd/selftest: Implement mock_get_viommu_size and mock_viommu_init
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2025 13:19:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aEyH1YPkmW1gy2da@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613134522.GE1174925@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 10:45:22AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 09, 2025 at 10:13:29AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > Sanitize the inputs and report the size of struct mock_viommu on success,
> > in mock_get_viommu_size().
> > 
> > The core will ensure the viommu_type is set to the core vIOMMU object, so
> > simply init the driver part in mock_viommu_init().
> > 
> > The mock_viommu_alloc() will be cleaned up once the transition is done.
> 
> Note the addition of the missed s2_parent store

I am adding a new patch in prep-v2 dropping the unused s2_parent:

-------------------------------------------------------------------
iommufd/selftest: Drop parent domain from mock_iommu_domain_nested

This is no use of this parent domain. Delete the dead code.

Note that the s2_parent in struct mock_viommu will be a deadcode too. Yet,
keep it because it will be soon used by HW queue objects, i.e. no point in
adding it back and forth in such a short window. Besides, keeping it could
cover the majority of vIOMMU use cases where a driver-level structure will
be larger in size than the core structure.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
-------------------------------------------------------------------

In this case, we don't need to assign mock_viommu->s2_parent here
since it's a dead code. The HW queue series will assign it and add
a use case:

+/* Test iommufd_hw_queue_depend/undepend() */
+static int mock_hw_queue_init_phys(struct iommufd_hw_queue *hw_queue, u32 index,
+                                  phys_addr_t base_addr_pa)
...
+       /*
+        * Test to catch a kernel bug if the core converted the physical address
+        * incorrectly. Let mock_domain_iova_to_phys() WARN_ON if it fails.
+        */
+       if (base_addr_pa != iommu_iova_to_phys(&mock_viommu->s2_parent->domain,
+                                              hw_queue->base_addr)) {
+               rc = -EFAULT;
+               goto unlock;
+       }

> > +static int mock_viommu_init(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu,
> > +			    struct iommu_domain *parent_domain)
> > +{
> > +	struct mock_iommu_device *mock_iommu = container_of(
> > +		viommu->iommu_dev, struct mock_iommu_device, iommu_dev);
> > +	struct mock_viommu *mock_viommu = to_mock_viommu(viommu);
> > +
> > +	refcount_inc(&mock_iommu->users);
> > +	mock_viommu->s2_parent = to_mock_domain(parent_domain);
> > +
> > +	viommu->ops = &mock_viommu_ops;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> 
> The patches will read better if you add the call logic for init along
> side alloc based on init or alloc ops being non-NULL in the prior
> patch and then have these driver patches replace alloc with init.
> 
> Duplicating alloc into init and leaving both makes the patch harder to
> check.

I see. That will add an additional patch tentatively supporting
both ops.

Thanks
Nicolin


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-13 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-09 17:13 [PATCH v1 00/12] iommufd: Repare for IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_QUEUE Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] iommufd: Apply obvious cosmetic fixes Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] iommufd: Drop unused ictx in struct iommufd_vdevice Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] iommufd: Use enum iommu_viommu_type for type in struct iommufd_viommu Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:06   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] iommufd: Use enum iommu_veventq_type for type in struct iommufd_veventq Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:07   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:36   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] iommu: Introduce get_viommu_size and viommu_init ops Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:12   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:06     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13  7:33       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:41   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 20:45     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] iommufd/selftest: Implement mock_get_viommu_size and mock_viommu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:17   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:12     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13  7:34       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 20:19     ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-06-13 23:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 23:37         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement arm_smmu_get_viommu_size and arm_vsmmu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:20   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:18     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13  7:36       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] iommufd/viommu: Replace ops->viommu_alloc with ops->viommu_init Nicolin Chen
2025-06-10  5:55   ` Baolu Lu
2025-06-10  6:19     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:22       ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:35         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:27   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-12 17:24     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] iommu: Deprecate viommu_alloc op Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:23   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] iommufd: Move _iommufd_object_alloc out of driver.c Nicolin Chen
2025-06-12  8:23   ` Tian, Kevin
2025-06-13 13:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] iommufd: Introduce iommufd_object_alloc_ucmd helper Nicolin Chen
2025-06-13 13:58   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-06-13 23:17     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-06-09 17:13 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] iommufd: Apply the new " Nicolin Chen
2025-06-10 18:32 ` [PATCH v1 00/12] iommufd: Repare for IOMMUFD_OBJ_HW_QUEUE Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aEyH1YPkmW1gy2da@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.