From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Abdun Nihaal <abdun.nihaal@gmail.com>
Cc: andy@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, tzimmermann@suse.de,
riyandhiman14@gmail.com, willy@infradead.org, notro@tronnes.org,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fix potential memory leak in fbtft_framebuffer_alloc()
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 20:50:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF2Ic8BP0zWS6R19@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626172412.18355-1-abdun.nihaal@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 10:54:10PM +0530, Abdun Nihaal wrote:
> In the error paths after fb_info structure is successfully allocated,
> the memory allocated in fb_deferred_io_init() for info->pagerefs is not
> freed. Fix that by adding the cleanup function on the error path.
Thanks for the report and the fix! My comments below.
...
> release_framebuf:
> + fb_deferred_io_cleanup(info);
> framebuffer_release(info);
While the fix sounds good, there are still problems in the driver in this area:
1) managed resources allocation is mixed up with plain allocations
(as you discovery hints);
2) the order in fbtft_framebuffer_release() is asymmetrical to what
we have in fbtft_framebuffer_alloc().
I would recommend to study this code a bit more and provide the following
patches as a result:
1) fixing the order in fbtft_framebuffer_release();
2) moving vmem allocation closer to when it's needed, i.e. just after
successful allocation of the info; at the same time move txbuf allocation
from managed to unmanaged (drop devm, add respective kfree() calls where
it's required);
3) this patch.
All three should have the respective Fixes tags and hence may be backported.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-26 17:24 [PATCH] staging: fbtft: fix potential memory leak in fbtft_framebuffer_alloc() Abdun Nihaal
2025-06-26 17:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2025-06-26 20:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-06-26 21:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-27 11:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-06-27 16:26 ` Abdun Nihaal
2025-06-26 18:02 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF2Ic8BP0zWS6R19@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=abdun.nihaal@gmail.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=notro@tronnes.org \
--cc=riyandhiman14@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.