From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>,
Alan Adamson <alan.adamson@oracle.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write size validation
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:05:09 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF3gNWvBaPpATiI+@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625064003.436582-3-hch@lst.de>
On Wed, Jun 25, 2025 at 08:39:56AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Don't mix the namespace and controller values, and validate the
> per-controller limit when probing the controller. This avoid spurious
> failures for controllers with namespaces that have different namespaces
nit: having namespaces with different logical block sizes
> with different logical block sizes, or report the per-namespace values
> only for some namespaces.
>
> It also fixes a missing queue_limits_cancel_update in an error path by
> removing that error path.
>
> Fixes: 8695f060a029 ("nvme: all namespaces in a subsystem must adhere to a common atomic write size")
> Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
I couldn't find the report on linux-nvme; if it is public, can you
include a "Closes:" link here?
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> Tested-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
I also saw a problem in a system running on 6.16-rc3 with several NVMe
subsystems, each containing one controller with AWUPF=0, each containing
two namespaces with NSABP=0. One namespace has a 512-byte LBA size while
the other has a 4096-byte LBA size, and some namespaces failed to add:
# dmesg | grep Inconsistent
[ 5.537494] nvme nvme4: nvme4n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=512 bytes, Controller/Namespace=4096 bytes
[ 5.539038] nvme nvme6: nvme6n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
[ 5.560079] nvme nvme7: nvme7n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
[ 5.595093] nvme nvme3: nvme3n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
[ 5.597627] nvme nvme8: nvme8n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=512 bytes, Controller/Namespace=4096 bytes
[ 5.600007] nvme nvme0: nvme0n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=512 bytes, Controller/Namespace=4096 bytes
[ 5.605748] nvme nvme5: nvme5n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=512 bytes, Controller/Namespace=4096 bytes
[ 5.608961] nvme nvme11: nvme11n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
[ 5.618011] nvme nvme12: nvme12n1: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
[ 5.618251] nvme nvme10: nvme10n2: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=4096 bytes, Controller/Namespace=512 bytes
Note that despite the messages saying otherwise, only those log lines
containing "Subsystem=512 bytes, Controller/Namespace=4096 bytes"
actually failed to add a namespace - the others had both namespaces
added just fine. I guess it isn't deterministic as to which namespace
was added first.
Anyways, the problem was fixed by this patch set.
Tested-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 33 +++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h | 3 +--
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index 520fb5f1e214..e533d791955d 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -2041,17 +2041,7 @@ static u32 nvme_configure_atomic_write(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> * no clear language in the specification prohibiting different
> * values for different controllers in the subsystem.
> */
> - atomic_bs = (1 + ns->ctrl->awupf) * bs;
> - }
> -
> - if (!ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs) {
> - ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs = atomic_bs;
> - } else if (ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs != atomic_bs) {
> - dev_err_ratelimited(ns->ctrl->device,
> - "%s: Inconsistent Atomic Write Size, Namespace will not be added: Subsystem=%d bytes, Controller/Namespace=%d bytes\n",
> - ns->disk ? ns->disk->disk_name : "?",
> - ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs,
> - atomic_bs);
> + atomic_bs = (1 + ns->ctrl->subsys->awupf) * bs;
> }
>
> lim->atomic_write_hw_max = atomic_bs;
> @@ -2386,16 +2376,6 @@ static int nvme_update_ns_info_block(struct nvme_ns *ns,
> if (!nvme_update_disk_info(ns, id, &lim))
> capacity = 0;
>
> - /*
> - * Validate the max atomic write size fits within the subsystem's
> - * atomic write capabilities.
> - */
> - if (lim.atomic_write_hw_max > ns->ctrl->subsys->atomic_bs) {
> - blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(ns->disk->queue, memflags);
> - ret = -ENXIO;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> nvme_config_discard(ns, &lim);
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BLK_DEV_ZONED) &&
> ns->head->ids.csi == NVME_CSI_ZNS)
> @@ -3219,6 +3199,7 @@ static int nvme_init_subsystem(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, struct nvme_id_ctrl *id)
> memcpy(subsys->model, id->mn, sizeof(subsys->model));
> subsys->vendor_id = le16_to_cpu(id->vid);
> subsys->cmic = id->cmic;
> + subsys->awupf = le16_to_cpu(id->awupf);
>
> /* Versions prior to 1.4 don't necessarily report a valid type */
> if (id->cntrltype == NVME_CTRL_DISC ||
> @@ -3556,6 +3537,15 @@ static int nvme_init_identify(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> if (ret)
> goto out_free;
> }
> +
> + if (le16_to_cpu(id->awupf) != ctrl->subsys->awupf) {
> + dev_err_ratelimited(ctrl->device,
> + "inconsistent AWUPF, controller not added (%u/%u).\n",
> + le16_to_cpu(id->awupf), ctrl->subsys->awupf);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> +
Could you explain (and perhaps add a comment here) why all controllers
in a subsystem must report the same awupf? Is it because namespaces may
inherit awupf from the controller, and may be reachable through multiple
controllers for multipath?
> memcpy(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev, id->fr,
> sizeof(ctrl->subsys->firmware_rev));
>
> @@ -3651,7 +3641,6 @@ static int nvme_init_identify(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_tolerance(ctrl->device);
> else if (!ctrl->apst_enabled && prev_apst_enabled)
> dev_pm_qos_hide_latency_tolerance(ctrl->device);
> - ctrl->awupf = le16_to_cpu(id->awupf);
> out_free:
> kfree(id);
> return ret;
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> index a468cdc5b5cb..7df2ea21851f 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h
> @@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ struct nvme_ctrl {
>
> enum nvme_ctrl_type cntrltype;
> enum nvme_dctype dctype;
> - u16 awupf; /* 0's based value. */
> };
>
> static inline enum nvme_ctrl_state nvme_ctrl_state(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> @@ -443,11 +442,11 @@ struct nvme_subsystem {
> u8 cmic;
> enum nvme_subsys_type subtype;
> u16 vendor_id;
> + u16 awupf; /* 0's based value. */
> struct ida ns_ida;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NVME_MULTIPATH
> enum nvme_iopolicy iopolicy;
> #endif
> - u32 atomic_bs;
> };
>
> /*
> --
> 2.47.2
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 6:39 fix atomic limits check v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25 6:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] nvme: refactor the atomic write unit detection Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-25 6:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] nvme: fix atomic write size validation Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-27 0:05 ` Uday Shankar [this message]
2025-06-27 0:18 ` Yi Zhang
2025-06-25 17:04 ` fix atomic limits check v2 alan.adamson
2025-06-26 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF3gNWvBaPpATiI+@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com \
--to=ushankar@purestorage.com \
--cc=alan.adamson@oracle.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
--cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.