All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/13] arm64: debug: call software breakpoint handlers statically
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:45:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF68kNx9UtbcAD08@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620211207.773980-4-ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>

On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:11:57PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> Software breakpoints pass an immediate value in ESR ("comment") that can
> be used to call a specialized handler (KGDB, KASAN...).
> We do so in two different ways :
>  - During early boot, `early_brk64` statically checks against known
>    immediates and calls the corresponding handler,
>  - During init, handlers are dynamically registered into a list. When
>    called, the generic software breakpoint handler will iterate over
>    the list to find the appropriate handler.
> 
> The dynamic registration does not provide any benefit here as it is not
> exported and all its uses are within the arm64 tree. It also depends on an
> RCU list, whose safe access currently relies on the non-preemptible state
> of `do_debug_exception`.
> 
> Replace the list iteration logic in `call_break_hooks` to call
> the breakpoint handlers statically if they are enabled, like in
> `early_brk64`.
> Expose the handlers in their respective headers to be reachable from
> `arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c` at link time.
> 
> Unify the naming of the software breakpoint handlers to XXX_brk_handler(),
> making it clear they are related and to differentiate from the
> hardware breakpoints.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kgdb.h                 |  3 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h              |  8 +++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/traps.h                |  6 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/uprobes.h              |  2 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c            | 54 +++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c                      | 22 ++-----
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes.c            | 31 ++--------
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/kprobes_trampoline.S |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/kernel/probes/uprobes.c            |  9 +--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c                     | 59 ++++---------------
>  10 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>

Will


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-27 16:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-20 21:11 [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:44   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] arm64: debug: call software breakpoint handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45   ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] arm64: debug: refactor reinstall_suspended_bps() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47   ` Will Deacon
2025-06-27 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Will Deacon
2025-06-27 17:27   ` Ada Couprie Diaz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aF68kNx9UtbcAD08@willie-the-truck \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.