From: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: tmc: Support atclk
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 14:27:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF6cVFA7NpN2S273@e129823.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250627-arm_cs_fix_clock_v4-v4-1-0ce0009c38f8@arm.com>
Hi Leo,
[...]
> @@ -789,6 +789,10 @@ static int __tmc_probe(struct device *dev, struct resource *res)
> struct coresight_desc desc = { 0 };
> struct coresight_dev_list *dev_list = NULL;
>
> + drvdata->atclk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, "atclk");
> + if (IS_ERR(drvdata->atclk))
> + return PTR_ERR(drvdata->atclk);
> +
> ret = -ENOMEM;
>
Just another quetion.
If this function is called from tmc_platform_probe() and failed,
should it call the clk_put() for drvdata->pclk when it failed?
--
Sincerely,
Yeoreum Yun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 11:51 [PATCH v4 00/10] coresight: Fix and improve clock usage Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] coresight: tmc: Support atclk Leo Yan
2025-06-27 13:27 ` Yeoreum Yun [this message]
2025-06-27 13:49 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-06-27 13:59 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] coresight: catu: " Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] coresight: etm4x: " Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] coresight: Appropriately disable programming clocks Leo Yan
2025-07-21 9:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-21 10:48 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-21 11:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-21 13:59 ` Leo Yan
2025-07-22 13:25 ` Suzuki K Poulose
[not found] ` <daece566-2cca-71dd-d21a-80dadad2c71b@huawei.com>
2025-07-23 10:23 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] coresight: Appropriately disable trace bus clocks Leo Yan
2025-07-21 9:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-21 13:42 ` Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] coresight: Avoid enable programming clock duplicately Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] coresight: Consolidate clock enabling Leo Yan
2025-06-30 5:37 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] coresight: Refactor driver data allocation Leo Yan
2025-06-30 5:47 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] coresight: Make clock sequence consistent Leo Yan
2025-06-27 11:51 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] coresight: Refactor runtime PM Leo Yan
2025-06-27 13:50 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] coresight: Fix and improve clock usage Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF6cVFA7NpN2S273@e129823.arm.com \
--to=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.