From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Christian Meissl <meissl.christian@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/dma-mapping: invalidate caches on arch_dma_prep_coherent
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFFq19W0D5JeOyeI@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43a834c8f871f8719368b3f3239f27ee4f6c6286.camel@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 09:54:46AM +0200, Christian Meissl wrote:
> since switching to dma-direct, memory using DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING
> is no longer allocated using the arch specific handlers and instead
> will use dma_direct_alloc_no_mapping. While the arm specific allocation
> handlers implicitly clear the allocated dma buffers and will flush any caches
> dma-direct relies on ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT to flush the caches.
>
> Without this flush video frame corruption can occur in drivers
> like the coda v4l2 driver which explicitly sets the DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING flag.
>
> Fixes: ae626eb97376 ("ARM/dma-mapping: use dma-direct unconditionally")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Meissl <meissl.christian@gmail.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> index 88c2d68a69c9..bde7ae4ba31a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/dma-mapping.c
> @@ -1821,3 +1821,11 @@ void arch_dma_free(struct device *dev, size_t size, void *cpu_addr,
> {
> __arm_dma_free(dev, size, cpu_addr, dma_handle, attrs, false);
> }
> +
> +void arch_dma_prep_coherent(struct page *page, size_t size)
> +{
> + void *ptr = page_address(page);
> +
> + dmac_flush_range(ptr, ptr + size);
> + outer_flush_range(__pa(ptr), __pa(ptr) + size);
> +}
It probably doesn't make any difference in practice, FWIW arm64 only
does a clean rather than flush (clean+invalidate) here.
What I noticed is that arch_dma_prep_coherent() is only called for
lowmem pages, so doing page_address() is safe. However, I don't think we
have anything to flush the caches for highmem pages.
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-17 7:54 [PATCH] ARM/dma-mapping: invalidate caches on arch_dma_prep_coherent Christian Meissl
2025-06-17 13:17 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFFq19W0D5JeOyeI@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=meissl.christian@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.