From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk,
sth@linux.ibm.com, gjoyce@ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 1/2] block: move elevator queue allocation logic into blk_mq_init_sched
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:07:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFGEzN5c0-b5VdcM@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250616173233.3803824-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:02:25PM +0530, Nilay Shroff wrote:
> In preparation for allocating sched_tags before freezing the request
> queue and acquiring ->elevator_lock, move the elevator queue allocation
> logic from the elevator ops ->init_sched callback into blk_mq_init_sched.
>
> This refactoring provides a centralized location for elevator queue
> initialization, which makes it easier to store pre-allocated sched_tags
> in the struct elevator_queue during later changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> block/bfq-iosched.c | 13 +++----------
> block/blk-mq-sched.c | 7 ++++++-
> block/elevator.h | 2 +-
> block/kyber-iosched.c | 11 ++---------
> block/mq-deadline.c | 14 ++------------
> 5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> index 0cb1e9873aab..fd26dc1901b0 100644
> --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
> @@ -7232,22 +7232,16 @@ static void bfq_init_root_group(struct bfq_group *root_group,
> root_group->sched_data.bfq_class_idle_last_service = jiffies;
> }
>
> -static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> +static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_queue *eq)
> {
> struct bfq_data *bfqd;
> - struct elevator_queue *eq;
> unsigned int i;
> struct blk_independent_access_ranges *ia_ranges = q->disk->ia_ranges;
>
> - eq = elevator_alloc(q, e);
> - if (!eq)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> bfqd = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*bfqd), GFP_KERNEL, q->node);
> - if (!bfqd) {
> - kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> + if (!bfqd)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> +
> eq->elevator_data = bfqd;
>
> spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
> @@ -7405,7 +7399,6 @@ static int bfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
>
> out_free:
> kfree(bfqd);
> - kobject_put(&eq->kobj);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> index 55a0fd105147..d914eb9d61a6 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
> @@ -475,6 +475,10 @@ int blk_mq_init_sched(struct request_queue *q, struct elevator_type *e)
> q->nr_requests = 2 * min_t(unsigned int, q->tag_set->queue_depth,
> BLKDEV_DEFAULT_RQ);
>
> + eq = elevator_alloc(q, e);
> + if (!eq)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> if (blk_mq_is_shared_tags(flags)) {
> ret = blk_mq_init_sched_shared_tags(q);
> if (ret)
The above failure needs to be handled by kobject_put(&eq->kobj).
Otherwise, feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Ming
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-16 17:32 [PATCHv3 0/2] block: move sched_tags allocation/de-allocation outside of locking context Nilay Shroff
2025-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCHv3 1/2] block: move elevator queue allocation logic into blk_mq_init_sched Nilay Shroff
2025-06-17 15:07 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-06-20 14:39 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-20 15:17 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-20 16:13 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 9:14 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-16 17:32 ` [PATCHv3 2/2] block: fix lock dependency between percpu alloc lock and elevator lock Nilay Shroff
2025-06-18 3:06 ` Ming Lei
2025-06-18 6:52 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 6:10 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-23 9:33 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-06-23 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFGEzN5c0-b5VdcM@fedora \
--to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=gjoyce@ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.