Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/gsp: fix potential leak of memory used during acpi init

[Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 03:05:10PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 01:29:20PM +0200, Philipp Stanner wrote:
> > On Tue, 2025-06-17 at 14:00 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/gsp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/gsp.c
> > > index baf42339f93e..b098a7555fde 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/gsp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/gsp/rm/r535/gsp.c
> > 
> > This seems to be based on a code move that is not yet in mainline.
> 
> It is, it did land with v6.16-rc1.
> 
> > Therefore, backporting the bugfix to stable seems difficult. Since that
> > code move is already in drm-misc-next, it would seem that it can only
> > be solved with two distinct patches for stable and for -next.
> 
> drm-misc-fixes is the relevant target branch and given the above, it contains
> the code move as well.
> 
> However, you're right that this fix won't apply to anything before v6.16-rc1.
> Given that, it makes sense to leave a note below the '---' line that this fix
> won't apply before v6.16-rc1 and that a backported patch will be sent to stable
> once this one hit Linus' tree.

Nevermind, I think this file wasn't split up and is correctly considered as
moved by git, so I think the patch should apply as is.