All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: remove the bt_meta_sectorsize field in struct buftarg
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 09:51:10 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFH_bpJrowjwTeV_@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250617105238.3393499-8-hch@lst.de>

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:52:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The file system only has a single file system sector size.

The external log device can have a different sector size to
the rest of the filesystem. This series looks like it removes the
ability to validate that the log device sector size in teh
superblock is valid for the backing device....

At minimum, the series description needs to be more than "this is
just a code cleanup" because it really changes the way block devices
are opened, configured and validated against the on-disk information
in the superblock....

-Dave.

-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-06-17 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-17 10:51 misc cleanups Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: clean up the initial read logic in xfs_readsb Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-01 14:55   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: remove the call to sync_blockdev in xfs_configure_buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 12:09   ` John Garry
2025-06-24 14:07     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 14:46       ` John Garry
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: remove the call to bdev_validate_blocksize " Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 23:40   ` Dave Chinner
2025-06-18  5:05     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: refactor xfs_calc_atomic_write_unit_max Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 11:44   ` John Garry
2025-06-18  5:08     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-18  6:28       ` John Garry
2025-06-24 14:09         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 15:03           ` John Garry
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: rename the bt_bdev_* buftarg fields Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 12:02   ` John Garry
2025-06-18  5:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-18  6:23       ` John Garry
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: remove the bt_bdev_file buftarg field Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 10:52 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: remove the bt_meta_sectorsize field in struct buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 12:15   ` John Garry
2025-06-17 12:21     ` John Garry
2025-06-18  5:11       ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-17 23:51   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2025-06-18  5:15     ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-19  2:42       ` Dave Chinner
2025-06-24 14:11         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-24 23:55           ` Dave Chinner
2025-06-25  6:23             ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-06-18  8:09   ` kernel test robot
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-07-01 10:40 misc cleanups v2 Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-01 10:40 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: remove the bt_meta_sectorsize field in struct buftarg Christoph Hellwig
2025-07-01 16:51   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-07-01 22:55   ` Dave Chinner
2025-07-03 13:44     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFH_bpJrowjwTeV_@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.