From: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
To: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 19:00:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFHze2MNk1LU1_13@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250613230852.2838268-1-bmarzins@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 07:08:52PM -0400, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> Due to the semantics of iterate_devices(), the current code allows a
> request-based dm table as long as it includes one request-stackable
> device. It is supposed to only allow tables where there are no
> non-request-stackable devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Amazing this type of bug is still lurking, thought I audited all of
the iterate_devices callout functions.. anyway, thanks for fixing it!
Reviewed-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-table.c | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-table.c b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> index 9f95f77687ef..d91207b2d77f 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-table.c
> @@ -898,17 +898,17 @@ static bool dm_table_supports_dax(struct dm_table *t,
> return true;
> }
>
> -static int device_is_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> - sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> +static int device_is_not_rq_stackable(struct dm_target *ti, struct dm_dev *dev,
> + sector_t start, sector_t len, void *data)
> {
> struct block_device *bdev = dev->bdev;
> struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>
> /* request-based cannot stack on partitions! */
> if (bdev_is_partition(bdev))
> - return false;
> + return true;
>
> - return queue_is_mq(q);
> + return !queue_is_mq(q);
> }
>
> static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
> @@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int dm_table_determine_type(struct dm_table *t)
>
> /* Non-request-stackable devices can't be used for request-based dm */
> if (!ti->type->iterate_devices ||
> - !ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
> + ti->type->iterate_devices(ti, device_is_not_rq_stackable, NULL)) {
> DMERR("table load rejected: including non-request-stackable devices");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-17 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-13 23:08 [PATCH] dm-table: fix checking for rq stackable devices Benjamin Marzinski
2025-06-17 23:00 ` Mike Snitzer [this message]
2025-06-23 9:59 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFHze2MNk1LU1_13@kernel.org \
--to=snitzer@kernel.org \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.