Re: [PTP][KSZ9477][p2p1step] Questions for PTP support on KSZ9477 device

[Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>]

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 10:07:32PM -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 05:10:11PM +0100, Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > On 17/06/2025 06:25, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > No, this will not work correctly. Both sides must use the same timestamping
> > > mode: either both "one step" or both "two step".
> > 
> > I'm not quite sure this statement is fully correct. I don't have a
> > hardware on hands to make this setup, but reading through the code in
> > linuxptp - the two-step fsm kicks off based on the message type bit. In case
> > when linuxptp receives 1-step sync, it does all the calculations.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> > For delay response packets on GM side it doesn't matter as GM doesn't do
> > any calculations. I don't see any requirements here from the perspective
> > of protocol itself.
> 
> Running on a PTP client, ptp4l will happily use either one or two step
> Sync messages from the server.

Thank you for clarification! In this case, something else was wrong, and
I made a wrong assumption. I had a non-working configuration, so I made
the assumption without verifying the code.

Best Regards,
Oleksij
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |