From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>, Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>
Cc: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] interconnect: avoid memory allocation when 'icc_bw_lock' is held
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:43:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFK0a8AIOl704DpP@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250529-icc-bw-lockdep-v1-1-3d714b6a9374@gmail.com>
On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 04:46:22PM +0200, Gabor Juhos wrote:
> The 'icc_bw_lock' mutex is introduced in commit af42269c3523
> ("interconnect: Fix locking for runpm vs reclaim") in order
> to decouple serialization of bw aggregation from codepaths
> that require memory allocation.
>
> However commit d30f83d278a9 ("interconnect: core: Add dynamic
> id allocation support") added a devm_kasprintf() call into a
> path protected by the 'icc_bw_lock' which causes this lockdep
> warning (at least on the IPQ9574 platform):
>
> ======================================================
> WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
> 6.15.0-next-20250529 #0 Not tainted
> ------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/0/1 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffffffc081df57d8 (icc_bw_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: icc_init+0x8/0x108
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffffffc081d7db10 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: icc_init+0x28/0x108
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
Thanks for fixing this. I get a similar splat with sc8280xp and the
icc_ism_l3 driver since 6.16-rc1.
Georgi, this is a regression that prevents lockdep from being used on a
bunch of Qualcomm platforms and should be fixed in mainline ASAP (e.g.
to avoid further locking issues from being introduced).
> Move the memory allocation part of the code outside of the protected
> path to eliminate the warning. Also add a note about why it is moved
> to there,
>
> Fixes: d30f83d278a9 ("interconnect: core: Add dynamic id allocation support")
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/interconnect/core.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/core.c b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> index 1a41e59c77f85a811f78986e98401625f4cadfa3..acdb3b8f1e54942dbb1b71ec2b170b08ad709e6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/interconnect/core.c
> @@ -1023,6 +1023,16 @@ void icc_node_add(struct icc_node *node, struct icc_provider *provider)
> return;
>
> mutex_lock(&icc_lock);
> +
> + if (node->id >= ICC_DYN_ID_START) {
> + /*
> + * Memory allocation must be done outside of codepaths
> + * protected by icc_bw_lock.
> + */
> + node->name = devm_kasprintf(provider->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s@%s",
> + node->name, dev_name(provider->dev));
> + }
The node name has already been set by the caller and the node has not
been added yet, so I think you should move this before taking the
icc_lock.
> +
> mutex_lock(&icc_bw_lock);
>
> node->provider = provider;
With that addressed, feel free to add my:
Reviewed-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 12:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <TIkPOGVjPeCjPzjVtlSb6V5CIcpaXf2-6WG6HjAyaOW59Hj01-9VK7Z8DKadakOKr6fJeQICi6h0Z8mft9DQyg==@protonmail.internalid>
2025-05-29 14:46 ` [PATCH] interconnect: avoid memory allocation when 'icc_bw_lock' is held Gabor Juhos
2025-05-30 9:16 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-03 9:15 ` Gabor Juhos
2025-06-03 10:01 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-18 12:50 ` Johan Hovold
2025-06-18 13:28 ` Bryan O'Donoghue
2025-06-18 12:43 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2025-06-18 19:38 ` Gabor Juhos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFK0a8AIOl704DpP@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=j4g8y7@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.