All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 22:12:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFQMrXRzui58krqA@zinc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025061817-jacket-nacho-50d6@gregkh>

On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 04:26:10PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2025 at 11:15:55PM +0900, Kisub Choe wrote:
> > Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_setBLANK' to
> 
> That doesn't rename anything :(
Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
> 
> 
> 
> > conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl
> > 
> > CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
> >  drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
> > @@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
> >  	pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
> >  	par = info->par;
> >  	output = &par->output;
> > -	return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
> > +	return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> > @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
> >  	crtc->ypanstep = 1;
> >  	crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
> >  
> > -	output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> > +	output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
> >  				 hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
> 
> Why do we even need this function pointer?  Why not just do the check
> above when it is called instead of this indirection?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Dear Greg,

Here is the updated patch with revised commit message. No code changes.

Regards,
Kisub Choe.

From 9c32c6f5091c8babe54bfde7b3a6de47d9026a55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 22:55:00 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK'

Rename 'proc_setBLANK' to 'proc_set_blank' to
conform with kernel style guidelines as reported by checkpatch.pl

CHECK: Avoid CamelCase: <proc_setBLANK>

Signed-off-by: Kisub Choe <kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
index 1d929aca399c..bb2ade6030c2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
@@ -577,7 +577,7 @@ static int lynxfb_ops_blank(int blank, struct fb_info *info)
 	pr_debug("blank = %d.\n", blank);
 	par = info->par;
 	output = &par->output;
-	return output->proc_setBLANK(output, blank);
+	return output->proc_set_blank(output, blank);
 }
 
 static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int sm750fb_set_drv(struct lynxfb_par *par)
 	crtc->ypanstep = 1;
 	crtc->ywrapstep = 0;
 
-	output->proc_setBLANK = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
+	output->proc_set_blank = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
 				 hw_sm750le_set_blank : hw_sm750_set_blank;
 	/* chip specific phase */
 	sm750_dev->accel.de_wait = (sm750_dev->revid == SM750LE_REVISION_ID) ?
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
index 9cf8b3d30aac..40051798efbf 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.h
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ struct lynxfb_output {
 	 */
 	void *priv;
 
-	int (*proc_setBLANK)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
+	int (*proc_set_blank)(struct lynxfb_output *output, int blank);
 };
 
 struct lynxfb_par {
-- 
2.34.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-19 13:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-18 14:15 [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: rename 'proc_setBLANK' Kisub Choe
2025-06-18 14:26 ` Greg KH
2025-06-19 13:12   ` Kisub Choe [this message]
2025-06-19 13:24     ` [PATCH v2] " Greg KH
2025-06-19 13:49       ` Kisub Choe
2025-06-19 13:52         ` Greg KH
2025-06-19 14:22           ` Kisub Choe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aFQMrXRzui58krqA@zinc \
    --to=kisub.choe.0x1@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.