From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A30B30E84D for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 09:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750672113; cv=none; b=brWT+9eDBHeMYKPVzP3yadcc6fWYu1gG8QuO9HFmCX5zq9xF9LEsj5odoy4VBPffQO47P1ki7VA+8zWkI4GwnzRfQGmXIA9l8IrJj8k2tSKqofSYHPadGKI+ccz/q1XNa3BcQZQCvtK6TG68+Frb+nckxhtuxJmqMiSvBITXBXU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750672113; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NCgWK0sHOtcx0qWsv6CUNDoABKi+IRiQgEufnW0Svdc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YVsw75tShOBAg/q6rJXX7+5yEzlnH85UId0N+hXfRs1RnkZbjzPR6AI4ZS0llChfsotnn+N6vYN6sUWSwYLn6uQojlu7N1wf2J+igUG4jlEL8DmQo6wRqIc15riselr5H2m6b24nGClGc+MlSqhnnQw+MGBuALqTWg+cX9zdAYg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=A9HGv3aq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.20 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="A9HGv3aq" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1750672112; x=1782208112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=NCgWK0sHOtcx0qWsv6CUNDoABKi+IRiQgEufnW0Svdc=; b=A9HGv3aq8t7p/8PhN0PzNckysENgaeGiNQALMuMrTTYEKkjZVVG/cnlA ZHn+tCJdgvy8nra0WU0RdKZ74kFhzeiWxC/CtGLPscXSkqogzDB0pv9Jh 5C7Kdipi6g71wtU/n+AKIcRRyFwJTu4ZCZIg2RpFuAJ/9OUrJVotYVWLy tpstnadooJcGCOn7MwgtiE0COKz2ctvlGIySOmJ8V7GjPKUPTsZdssUEB 7v6xskuXFO/ecldrYbF4JSvJ5eqkdjgbGdcXohUgqaotrnczXVQezqz+A 2dMA+whQ26vnyL/HNL2zmmCRf+Vm3Od84kk4U0phjLV0lOdINbS7RcHTr Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Ga/vcxPRTk+gYluw9yhroA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: MJXEe4LuTFuVtgP6Vhn/MQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11472"; a="52588122" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,258,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="52588122" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2025 02:48:31 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: PQzRGt4/SfS8y2H3smdi+w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SoNtNQ2lRhSP5MYVoH2V6w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,258,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="182597098" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Jun 2025 02:48:28 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uTdmr-000000097uT-2ON2; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:48:25 +0300 Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:48:25 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] x86/defconfigs: Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig Message-ID: References: <20250623072536.3425344-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20250623090642.GAaFkZIq__HR0FJE-0@fat_crate.local> <20250623093156.GBaFkfDAN3bgiyV_IL@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:46:45PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 11:31:56AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 12:21:03PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Ah, this is just a cherry-pick (with fixing conflicts, updated Fixes > > > and removed the last paragraph) of 5y.o. 76366050eb1b ("x86/defconfigs: > > > Explicitly unset CONFIG_64BIT in i386_defconfig"), > > >> > > What? FWIW< the bug is repetitive (third time already?) that the i386_defconfig was refreshed with ARCH=x86_64 or so and in the result the CONFIG_64BIT is set to 'y' for 32-bit code. > > A 5yo patch cherrypicked from somewhere has as a Fixes tag a patch from 10 > > days ago?!?! > > The base for my patch was the 5.y.o. patch. > > > > it should be standalone patch. I borrowed the commit message. So, whatever > > > you prefer: I can send it again as the original one, one of x86 maintainers > > > can do themselves the cherry-picking / conflict resolution, or I can resend > > > it as mine. > > > > You should do a proper patch as it is done and not do a mish-mash of old and > > new things, clarify with Daniel who's going to be the author and you should > > write a commit message which explains the situation properly, not borrow one. > > It is describes situation properly. Just a test was different in this case. > Okay, let me try again in v2. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko