From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
will@kernel.org, song@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
usamaarif642@gmail.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: arm64: BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in arch_stack_walk
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 12:56:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFlA1tXXUEBZP1NH@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+fCnZfzHOFjVo43UZK8H6h3j=OHjfF13oFJvT0P-SM84Oc4qQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 02:57:16PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 2:33 PM Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> wrote:
> > I'm encountering a KASAN warning during aarch64 boot and I am struggling
> > to determine the cause. I haven't come across any reports about this on
> > the mailing list so far, so I'm sharing this early in case others are
> > seeing it too.
> >
> > This issue occurs both on Linus's upstream branch and in the 6.15 final
> > release. The stack trace below is from 6.15 final. I haven't started
> > bisecting yet, but that's my next step.
> >
> > Here are a few details about the problem:
> >
> > 1) it happen on my kernel boots on a aarch64 host
> > 2) The lines do not match the code very well, and I am not sure why. It
> > seems it is offset by two lines. The stack is based on commit
> > 0ff41df1cb26 ("Linux 6.15")
> > 3) My config is at https://pastebin.com/ye46bEK9
> >
> >
> > [ 235.831690] ==================================================================
> > [ 235.861238] BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in arch_stack_walk (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:346 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:387)
> > [ 235.887206] Write of size 96 at addr a5ff80008ae8fb80 by task kworker/u288:26/3666
> > [ 235.918139] Pointer tag: [a5], memory tag: [00]
> > [ 235.942722] Workqueue: efi_rts_wq efi_call_rts
> > [ 235.942732] Call trace:
> > [ 235.942734] show_stack (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:468) (C)
> > [ 235.942741] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
> > [ 235.942748] print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:409 mm/kasan/report.c:521)
> > [ 235.942755] kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:636)
> > [ 235.942759] kasan_check_range (mm/kasan/sw_tags.c:85)
> > [ 235.942764] memset (mm/kasan/shadow.c:53)
> > [ 235.942769] arch_stack_walk (arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:346 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:387)
> > [ 235.942773] return_address (arch/arm64/kernel/return_address.c:44)
> > [ 235.942778] trace_hardirqs_off.part.0 (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:95)
> > [ 235.942784] trace_hardirqs_off_finish (kernel/trace/trace_preemptirq.c:98)
> > [ 235.942789] enter_from_kernel_mode (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:62)
> > [ 235.942794] el1_interrupt (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:559 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:575)
> > [ 235.942799] el1h_64_irq_handler (arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:581)
> > [ 235.942804] el1h_64_irq (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:596)
> > [ 235.942809] 0x3c52ff1ecc (P)
> > [ 235.942825] 0x3c52ff0ed4
> > [ 235.942829] 0x3c52f902d0
> > [ 235.942833] 0x3c52f953e8
> > [ 235.942837] __efi_rt_asm_wrapper (arch/arm64/kernel/efi-rt-wrapper.S:49)
> > [ 235.942843] efi_call_rts (drivers/firmware/efi/runtime-wrappers.c:269)
> > [ 235.942848] process_one_work (./arch/arm64/include/asm/jump_label.h:36 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:110 kernel/workqueue.c:3243)
> > [ 235.942854] worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3313 kernel/workqueue.c:3400)
> > [ 235.942858] kthread (kernel/kthread.c:464)
> > [ 235.942863] ret_from_fork (arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863)
> >
> > [ 236.436924] The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at
> > [a5ff80008ae80000, a5ff80008aea0000) created by:
> > arm64_efi_rt_init (arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c:219)
> >
> > [ 236.506959] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
> > [ 236.529724] page: refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x12682
> > [ 236.562077] flags: 0x17fffd6c0000000(node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1ffff|kasantag=0x5b)
> > [ 236.593722] raw: 017fffd6c0000000 0000000000000000 dead000000000122 0000000000000000
> > [ 236.625365] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
> > [ 236.657004] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> >
> > [ 236.685828] Memory state around the buggy address:
> > [ 236.705390] ffff80008ae8f900: 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5
> > [ 236.734899] ffff80008ae8fa00: a5 a5 a5 00 00 00 00 00 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5
> > [ 236.764409] >ffff80008ae8fb00: 00 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 00
> > [ 236.793918] ^
> > [ 236.818810] ffff80008ae8fc00: a7 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5
> > [ 236.848321] ffff80008ae8fd00: a5 a5 a5 a5 00 a5 00 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5 a5
> > [ 236.877828] ==================================================================
>
> Looks like the memory allocated/mapped in arm64_efi_rt_init() is
> tagged by __vmalloc_node(). And this memory then gets used as a
> (irq-related? EFI-related?) stack. And having the SP register tagged
> breaks SW_TAGS instrumentation AFAIR [1], which is likely what
> produces this report.
>
> Adding kasan_reset_tag() to arm64_efi_rt_init() should likely fix
> this; similar to what we have in arch_alloc_vmap_stack(). Or should we
> make arm64_efi_rt_init() just call arch_alloc_vmap_stack()?
In theory, we can still disable the vmap stack, so we either fall back
to something else or require that EFI runtime depends on VMAP_STACK.
We can do like init_sdei_stacks(), just bail out if VMAP_STACK is
disabled.
Adding Ard, it's his code.
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=51fb34de2a4c8fa0f221246313700bfe3b6c586d
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-23 20:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 12:33 arm64: BUG: KASAN: invalid-access in arch_stack_walk Breno Leitao
2025-06-22 12:57 ` Andrey Konovalov
2025-06-23 11:56 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2025-06-23 16:56 ` Breno Leitao
2025-06-24 9:00 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFlA1tXXUEBZP1NH@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=usamaarif642@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.