From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768242C1592; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:45:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750700732; cv=none; b=tRO9/xVDbxEhHXC7kJx99PmMyW2Csvtac0p0EnoeKNw/6bF9M5F0W3SPgnvT5om0YDVOuwT3/9i4jjevuhKtoBMgdBOFBgdfhg8p+be9A/TqZ2uyBbaTrEcgFL3pRvp4O34+Cf4uJr6m/f1HNUXfD6xAGZGwwMkyS2zTLMh4Fcs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1750700732; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hYv4xKHzWZDN1ntMAQvYZjMbKiXIkvOEWDoc+shcdVQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PZIQ4aIsEHd3ozTVNzeL76ECIygz4IGolEyudUZo9x1Srsjv+AT7VEy1iO2Kfb4nrGau30cESsoMaUlZ3AOTFrjFS3URjBOtVSWugcPgkSO5JC2JB6SbpXOWAMOifrFBGBRLQsIHNjgC6E/TsRqwu/OKhs2nLjl/PfxkwI27CaM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=s69Azbip; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="s69Azbip" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DF87C4CEEA; Mon, 23 Jun 2025 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1750700732; bh=hYv4xKHzWZDN1ntMAQvYZjMbKiXIkvOEWDoc+shcdVQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=s69AzbipW2fqfvaiyCWr0xfg/6uYVtksIIIQZVOQmEKUT3KhpPEAWFk98qeOqKb4O xF4hveD5INWbdMRmkrIQdP7aNYUxkLX8S7LWhmw9fDkR2cli+jRR/yv5IhvJo59LPV smnHAZNwLiIcmIGP5z/uSZtK2Li2WepUjjCmp61aJtN7aZI7XuJvZlh7ZsKRnCv3WT Tj4VVEHaWvgUR1dB6v4uUabO8KkE13Cw6DMWHmU6AVfMUP0VM4onwNIDVNa6vXgCOU k9hS1nqetrbRL8m+SUwB3M4TfYkulPIuI6Mwx7qHJTy23F2wfEjy+5Y6g/R/r7wqjC 4/IZDye+anksg== Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:45:29 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers Cc: Namhyung Kim , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf test workload noploop: Name the noploop process Message-ID: References: <20250619002034.97007-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 08:12:47AM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 12:36 PM Namhyung Kim wrote: > > I'm afraid it'd introduce a build failure on musl. Please see > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20250611092542.F4ooE2FL@linutronix.de/ > > I think would be enough. > we could do that but in the glibc man page it says: > https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/prctl.2.html > ``` > #include /* Definition of PR_* constants */ > #include > ``` > It'd be nice to think musl was slowly getting fixed. I notice we're Sebastian reported on the musl libc, its maintainer replied: https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2025/06/12/11 - ARnaldo