From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06BF0C77B7C for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1023196.1399124 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTy7h-00042U-4w; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:17 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1023196.1399124; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:17 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTy7h-00042N-0e; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:17 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1023196; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:15 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTy7f-00040v-G4 for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:15 +0000 Received: from mail-24416.protonmail.ch (mail-24416.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.16]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 34ce7faa-50cd-11f0-b894-0df219b8e170; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:31:13 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 34ce7faa-50cd-11f0-b894-0df219b8e170 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1750750272; x=1751009472; bh=m4tkI/DAqBg5rxuU99pgQ/A8zGC86vUO0IgnqLYERYI=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=RL7r2O94A7isnlu8LEcHToWsqAIyPTtnc7mliPjWelPitgg7Rn5cX8HqW5qYXYgqX 0eP1hFwu3DsImXwwHQJAdn/gvKkt1N/0g060J9AhmjjmT8S5E1571O0W4z7olUd/7K qZYJRIfm7MBo2LVfbUi+HrDOejax2uBDxsQj7U7MmNZCq72DbJrjh42uc0oe1sj51v Lz+bWBbOSe70mtMFA5CDqygE8OJN8u2f5jQCYDUQwUx3GCGwj+gHgn0hWckSaraw5w LwdZatbOvbksJEgaY8LcU3JBsLC4MNxg6TBN1pkwaxPbLi1VKIjaMModzUufxsbe16 ljhdkRgX1GYEA== Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:31:05 +0000 To: Jan Beulich From: dmkhn@proton.me Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, anthony.perard@vates.tech, julien@xen.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, dmukhin@ford.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 13/16] drivers/vuart: move PL011 emulator code Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6b2938a2-aa42-421f-b948-44e74f463b21@suse.com> References: <20250624035443.344099-1-dmukhin@ford.com> <20250624035443.344099-14-dmukhin@ford.com> <6b2938a2-aa42-421f-b948-44e74f463b21@suse.com> Feedback-ID: 123220910:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: d2e80d935fc37cdffd1531920a5f260b0e2d4858 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:50:33AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.2025 05:56, dmkhn@proton.me wrote: > > From: Denis Mukhin > > > > Move PL011 emulator to the new location for UART emulators. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Denis Mukhin > > --- > > xen/arch/arm/Kconfig | 7 ------- > > xen/arch/arm/Makefile | 1 - > > xen/drivers/Kconfig | 2 ++ > > xen/drivers/Makefile | 1 + > > xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > xen/drivers/vuart/Makefile | 1 + > > .../arm/vpl011.c =3D> drivers/vuart/vuart-pl011.c} | 0 > > 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig > > create mode 100644 xen/drivers/vuart/Makefile > > rename xen/{arch/arm/vpl011.c =3D> drivers/vuart/vuart-pl011.c} (100%) >=20 > I question the placement under drivers/. To me, driver !=3D emulator. I > wonder what others think. But yes, we already have drivers/vpci/. That > may want moving then ... re: driver !=3D emulator: I agree; but I followed drivers/vpci. Do you think common/vuart would be a better location? >=20 > Jan