From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20741C7EE31 for ; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.1023221.1399165 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTyD9-0006l8-E3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:55 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 1023221.1399165; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:55 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTyD9-0006l1-A3; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:55 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 1023221; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:54 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-sth1-in.inumbo.com ([159.253.27.254] helo=se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1uTyD7-0006TF-7F for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:54 +0000 Received: from mail-24418.protonmail.ch (mail-24418.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.18]) by se1-gles-sth1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id fe729d3c-50cd-11f0-a30f-13f23c93f187; Tue, 24 Jun 2025 09:36:52 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: fe729d3c-50cd-11f0-a30f-13f23c93f187 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=protonmail; t=1750750611; x=1751009811; bh=42siax0kogyrned8KRupFi9IYG+ihop/uG0YVs9QMik=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=PbU7jM4k/BRHywwJLwDQz3VMvTaqDwZT512bmPi7fvx4zWwIFqy2YOeJ22ROnzmYF /pQsrXsY4CPpWeR7NmkYMAlH45NYm9CSDjZpg6aNHZ8RMM+z9I2cXSg8wzlDJU0Ekw D0xmRSKbWrY+5a6BoQojc7m45WJ3KkNmCZ3osWL3XGoKM1zP0iLRfUBe+efvhGPpmU gIm8fuqv3+oq8QfPnPJsRLD9e0UsnUhTy+l6jvUHt553o7erzveQI/rg3IEt4GaNX9 66cXLV5efywR4354jEZM/Ko4tG6kIqusq6O0bCunmIw/WEf0La2sFalne6JD2ypQUG 5hfKmcRQmBUNA== Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:36:47 +0000 To: Jan Beulich From: dmkhn@proton.me Cc: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, anthony.perard@vates.tech, julien@xen.org, michal.orzel@amd.com, oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com, roger.pau@citrix.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, dmukhin@ford.com, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 14/16] drivers/vuart: move simple MMIO-based UART emulator Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <6e6c8664-2ff6-484d-bd47-7ee12c449f9e@suse.com> References: <20250624035443.344099-1-dmukhin@ford.com> <20250624035443.344099-15-dmukhin@ford.com> <6e6c8664-2ff6-484d-bd47-7ee12c449f9e@suse.com> Feedback-ID: 123220910:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 6f04fe74cf678d739b6fe28d14061cfbb820540f MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 07:53:04AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 24.06.2025 05:57, dmkhn@proton.me wrote: > > --- a/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig > > +++ b/xen/drivers/vuart/Kconfig > > @@ -3,6 +3,15 @@ config HAS_VUART > > > > if (ARM_32 || ARM_64) > > > > +config HAS_VUART_MMIO > > +=09bool "Simple MMIO-based emulated UART support" >=20 > Perhaps in a separate change this should be renamed. HAS_* should never > have prompts. Oh, so HAS_ flags are non-interactive selectors by design? I did not find explanation in the docs :-/ Can you please explain? (and I will add a note to docs for that) >=20 > > +=09default y > > +=09select HAS_VUART >=20 > This is questionable too (for still being controlled by a prompt), but > may need to remain as is. >=20 > Jan