From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
maddy@linux.ibm.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, huschle@linux.ibm.com,
srikar@linux.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 9/9] [DEBUG] powerpc: add debug file for set/unset cpu avoid
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 18:53:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFx94BDKk_WJ48pK@yury> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250625191108.1646208-10-sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 12:41:08AM +0530, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Reference patch for how an architecture can make use of this infra.
>
> This is not meant to be merged. Instead the vp_manual_hint should either
> come from hardware or could be derived using steal time.
If you don't add any code that manages the 'avoid' mask on the host
side, all this becomes a dead code.
> When the provided hint is less than the total CPUs in the system, it
> will enable the cpu avoid static key and set those CPUs as avoid.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h | 2 ++
> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> index b78b82d66057..b6497e0b60d8 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/paravirt.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> #include <asm/hvcall.h>
> #endif
>
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(paravirt_cpu_avoid_enabled);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SPLPAR
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <asm/kvm_guest.h>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> index 5ac7084eebc0..e00cdc4de441 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> #include <asm/systemcfg.h>
>
> #include <trace/events/ipi.h>
> +#include <linux/debugfs.h>
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
> #include <asm/udbg.h>
> @@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ bool has_big_cores __ro_after_init;
> bool coregroup_enabled __ro_after_init;
> bool thread_group_shares_l2 __ro_after_init;
> bool thread_group_shares_l3 __ro_after_init;
> +static int vp_manual_hint = NR_CPUS;
>
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_sibling_map);
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, cpu_smallcore_map);
> @@ -1727,6 +1729,7 @@ static void __init build_sched_topology(void)
> BUG_ON(i >= ARRAY_SIZE(powerpc_topology) - 1);
>
> set_sched_topology(powerpc_topology);
> + vp_manual_hint = num_present_cpus();
> }
>
> void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
> @@ -1807,4 +1810,51 @@ void __noreturn arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> start_secondary_resume();
> }
>
> +/*
> + * sysfs hint to mark CPUs as Avoid. This will help in restricting
> + * the workload to specified number of CPUs.
> + * For example 40 > vp_manual_hint means, workload will run on
> + * 0-39 CPUs.
> + */
> +
> +static int pv_vp_manual_hint_set(void *data, u64 val)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> +
> + if (val == 0 || vp_manual_hint > num_present_cpus())
> + vp_manual_hint = num_present_cpus();
> +
> + if (val != vp_manual_hint)
> + vp_manual_hint = val;
This all is effectively just:
vp_manual_hint = val;
Isn't?
> + if (vp_manual_hint < num_present_cpus())
> + static_branch_enable(¶virt_cpu_avoid_enabled);
> + else
> + static_branch_disable(¶virt_cpu_avoid_enabled);
> +
> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> + if (cpu >= vp_manual_hint)
> + set_cpu_avoid(cpu, true);
> + else
> + set_cpu_avoid(cpu, false);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pv_vp_manual_hint_get(void *data, u64 *val)
> +{
> + *val = vp_manual_hint;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +DEFINE_SIMPLE_ATTRIBUTE(fops_pv_vp_manual_hint, pv_vp_manual_hint_get, pv_vp_manual_hint_set, "%llu\n");
> +
> +static __init int paravirt_debugfs_init(void)
> +{
> + if (is_shared_processor())
> + debugfs_create_file("vp_manual_hint", 0600, arch_debugfs_dir, NULL, &fops_pv_vp_manual_hint);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +device_initcall(paravirt_debugfs_init)
> #endif
> --
> 2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 22:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-25 19:10 [RFC v2 0/9] cpu avoid state and push task mechanism Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 1/9] sched/docs: Document avoid_cpu_mask and avoid CPU concept Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-26 6:27 ` Hillf Danton
2025-06-26 14:46 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-27 0:27 ` Hillf Danton
2025-06-27 4:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-28 22:02 ` Hillf Danton
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 2/9] cpumask: Introduce cpu_avoid_mask Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 3/9] sched/core: Dont allow to use CPU marked as avoid Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 4/9] sched/fair: Don't use CPU marked as avoid for wakeup and load balance Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-26 0:02 ` Yury Norov
2025-06-26 13:42 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 5/9] sched/rt: Don't select CPU marked as avoid for wakeup and push/pull rt task Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 6/9] sched/core: Push current task out if CPU is marked as avoid Shrikanth Hegde
2025-08-12 18:40 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 7/9] sched: Add static key check for cpu_avoid Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-26 0:12 ` Yury Norov
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 8/9] sysfs: Add cpu_avoid file Shrikanth Hegde
2025-07-01 9:35 ` Greg KH
2025-07-02 6:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 19:11 ` [RFC v2 9/9] [DEBUG] powerpc: add debug file for set/unset cpu avoid Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 22:53 ` Yury Norov [this message]
2025-06-26 13:39 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2025-06-25 21:55 ` [RFC v2 0/9] cpu avoid state and push task mechanism Yury Norov
2025-06-26 14:33 ` Shrikanth Hegde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFx94BDKk_WJ48pK@yury \
--to=yury.norov@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=huschle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.