Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: TDX: Remove redundant definitions of TDX_TD_ATTR_*

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Tue, Jul 08, 2025, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> There are definitions of TD attributes bits inside asm/shared/tdx.h as
> TDX_ATTR_*.
> 
> Remove KVM's definitions and use the ones in asm/shared/tdx.h
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c      | 4 ++--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx_arch.h | 6 ------
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> index c539c2e6109f..efb7d589b672 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/tdx.c
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void tdh_vp_wr_failed(struct vcpu_tdx *tdx, char *uclass, char *op, u32 field,
>  	pr_err("TDH_VP_WR[%s.0x%x]%s0x%llx failed: 0x%llx\n", uclass, field, op, val, err);
>  }
>  
> -#define KVM_SUPPORTED_TD_ATTRS (TDX_TD_ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE)
> +#define KVM_SUPPORTED_TD_ATTRS (TDX_ATTR_SEPT_VE_DISABLE)

Would it make sense to rename KVM_SUPPORTED_TD_ATTRS to KVM_SUPPORTED_TDX_ATTRS?
The names from common code lack the TD qualifier, and I think it'd be helpful for
readers to have have TDX in the name (even though I agree "TD" is more precise).