From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
To: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@sk.com>, Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] mm: convert FPB_IGNORE_* into FPB_HONOR_*
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2025 11:59:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGEAWMKsK2VtdbI8@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9427d552-b94d-4b27-a4e3-ed958c153b48@lucifer.local>
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 05:33:06PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 06:30:13PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 27.06.25 18:28, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 01:55:07PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > > Honoring these PTE bits is the exception, so let's invert the meaning.
> > > >
> > > > With this change, most callers don't have to pass any flags.
> > > >
> > > > No functional change intended.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > This is a nice change, it removes a lot of code I really didn't enjoy
> > > looking at for introducing these flags all over the place.
> > >
> > > But a nit on the naming below, I'm not a fan of 'honor' here :)
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > > mm/internal.h | 16 ++++++++--------
> > > > mm/madvise.c | 3 +--
> > > > mm/memory.c | 11 +++++------
> > > > mm/mempolicy.c | 4 +---
> > > > mm/mlock.c | 3 +--
> > > > mm/mremap.c | 3 +--
> > > > mm/rmap.c | 3 +--
> > > > 7 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > > > index e84217e27778d..9690c75063881 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > > > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > > > @@ -202,17 +202,17 @@ static inline void vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > > > /* Flags for folio_pte_batch(). */
> > > > typedef int __bitwise fpb_t;
> > > >
> > > > -/* Compare PTEs after pte_mkclean(), ignoring the dirty bit. */
> > > > -#define FPB_IGNORE_DIRTY ((__force fpb_t)BIT(0))
> > > > +/* Compare PTEs honoring the dirty bit. */
> > > > +#define FPB_HONOR_DIRTY ((__force fpb_t)BIT(0))
> > >
> > > Hm not to be petty but... :)
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I find 'honor' very clear here. Ignore is very clear, 'honor' (God
> > > the British English in me wants to say honour here but stipp :P) doesn't
> > > necessarily tell you what is going to happen.
> > >
> > > Perhaps PROPAGATE? or OBEY?
> >
> > RESPECT? :)
DONT_IGNORE ;-)
> 🎵 R-E-S-P-E-C-T find out what it means to me... ;) 🎵
>
> This works too :>)
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-29 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-27 11:55 [PATCH v1 0/4] mm: folio_pte_batch() improvements David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] mm: convert FPB_IGNORE_* into FPB_HONOR_* David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 13:40 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 16:28 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-27 16:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 16:33 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-29 8:59 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2025-06-30 13:47 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-28 3:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-28 21:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 3:34 ` Dev Jain
2025-06-30 9:04 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 9:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 9:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 10:57 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-06-30 11:01 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 14:35 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-02 8:31 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] mm: smaller folio_pte_batch() improvements David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 13:58 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 16:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-27 17:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 18:39 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 17:40 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-02 8:42 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-02 8:48 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 8:51 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 9:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 9:08 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-07-02 9:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] mm: split folio_pte_batch() into folio_pte_batch() and folio_pte_batch_ext() David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 14:19 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 15:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 18:48 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 10:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 10:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 17:45 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-02 9:02 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-02 9:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 9:07 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-07-02 9:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 9:09 ` Oscar Salvador
2025-06-27 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] mm: remove boolean output parameters from folio_pte_batch_ext() David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 14:34 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 15:11 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-27 15:40 ` Lance Yang
2025-06-27 19:04 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 9:32 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 11:08 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 11:18 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-06-30 11:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-06-30 17:59 ` Zi Yan
2025-07-02 9:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-07-02 9:09 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aGEAWMKsK2VtdbI8@kernel.org \
--to=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=byungchul@sk.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.