All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>,
	Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org>,
	Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>,
	Antony Antony <antony@phenome.org>, Tuomo Soini <tis@foobar.fi>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@linux-ipsec.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC ipsec-next] pfkey: Deprecate pfkey
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2025 10:26:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aGeQPzULveCLU4Bq@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aGd60lOmCtytjTYU@gauss3.secunet.de>

Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> wrote:
> The pfkey user configuration interface was replaced by the netlink
> user configuration interface more than a decade ago. In between
> all maintained IKE implementations moved to the netlink interface.
> So let 'config NET_KEY' default to no in Kconfig. The pfkey code
> will be removed in a second step.

I'd suggest to also do something like
b144fcaf46d4 ("dccp: Print deprecation notice.")

> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
> ---
>  net/xfrm/Kconfig | 11 +++++++----
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/Kconfig b/net/xfrm/Kconfig
> index f0157702718f..aedea7a892db 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/xfrm/Kconfig
> @@ -110,14 +110,17 @@ config XFRM_IPCOMP
>  	select CRYPTO_DEFLATE
>  
>  config NET_KEY
> -	tristate "PF_KEY sockets"
> +	tristate "PF_KEY sockets (deprecated)"
>  	select XFRM_ALGO
> +	default n
>  	help
>  	  PF_KEYv2 socket family, compatible to KAME ones.
> -	  They are required if you are going to use IPsec tools ported
> -	  from KAME.
>  
> -	  Say Y unless you know what you are doing.
> +	  The PF_KEYv2 socket interface is deprecated and
> +	  scheduled for removal. Please use the netlink
> +	  interface (XFRM_USER) to configure IPsec.

Perhaps this should mention that all existing IKE daemons
no longer need this resp. that this is only required for
ancient/unmaintained KAME tools?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-04  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-04  6:55 [PATCH RFC ipsec-next] pfkey: Deprecate pfkey Steffen Klassert
2025-07-04  8:26 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-07-04  9:32 ` Herbert Xu
2025-07-09  5:42 ` [devel-ipsec] " Antony Antony
2025-07-09  5:56 ` Tobias Brunner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aGeQPzULveCLU4Bq@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=andreas.steffen@strongswan.org \
    --cc=antony@phenome.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devel@linux-ipsec.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@nohats.ca \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=tis@foobar.fi \
    --cc=tobias@strongswan.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.