From: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xiaoyao.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to .instance_init
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 14:32:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHCwAXmW0De8ptqK@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250711000603.438312-5-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 02:06:03AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2025 02:06:03 +0200
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to
> .instance_init
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.50.0
>
> With the reordering of instance_post_init callbacks that is new in 10.1
> accel_cpu_instance_init must execute in .instance_init as is already
> the case for RISC-V. Otherwise, for example, setting the vendor
> property is broken when using KVM or Hypervisor.framework, because
> KVM sets it *after* the user's value is set by DeviceState's
> intance_post_init callback.
>
> Reported-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
no, Intel doesn't deserve this credit. Instead, this bug is reported
from these 2 people:
"Like Xu" <like.xu.linux@gmail.com> - KUT Test
"Dongli Zhang" <dongli.zhang@oracle.com> - PMU Fix
For reference: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/aFpocfTpBLB34N3l@intel.com/
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Zhao Liu <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-11 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-11 0:05 [PATCH 0/4] target/i386: fix position of accel_cpu_instance_init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 1/4] target/i386: move max_features to class Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 1:52 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 3:43 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 2/4] target/i386: nvmm, whpx: add accel/CPU class that sets host vendor Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:12 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 2:17 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 6:40 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 7:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 5:36 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 3/4] target/i386: allow reordering max_x86_cpu_initfn vs accel CPU init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:20 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:08 ` Zhao Liu
2025-07-11 0:06 ` [PATCH 4/4] target/i386: move accel_cpu_instance_init to .instance_init Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 2:26 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-07-11 6:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-07-11 6:32 ` Zhao Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHCwAXmW0De8ptqK@intel.com \
--to=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.