All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: "Summers, Stuart" <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	"Roper, Matthew D" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
	"De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
	"Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] drm/xe: Don't expose device attributes for VFs
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 06:55:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHXRQKfgVo4rDYBX@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555ca90e14209445dd5ced8f95ce729fe9b2fda4.camel@intel.com>

On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:00:54PM +0530, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-07-12 at 05:24 +0300, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 02:19:50AM +0530, Summers, Stuart wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2025-07-12 at 00:38 +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > Commit a7f87deac229 ("drm/xe: Default auto_link_downgrade status
> > > > to
> > > > false")
> > > > tried to fix the side effect of xe_pcode_read() returning
> > > > successfully
> > > > without valid data-out value when xe->info.skip_pcode is set.
> > > > Since
> > > > this
> > > > is true for IS_SRIOV_VF() cases, a much robust fix would be to
> > > > not
> > > > expose
> > > > device attributes for VFs, which covers wider pcode mailbox
> > > > users.
> > > 
> > > I'm not fully understanding your reasoning here. Why can't we just
> > > use
> > > a check against skip_pcode in that case? VF might be the main user
> > > there, but it isn't inconceivable that we will use that in other
> > > scenarios too and then hit a similar problem of accessing an
> > > uninitialized variable.
> > 
> > This also covers non-mailbox attributes which would be unusable for
> > VFs.
> > So we can either fix the commit message or use skip_pcode check
> > against
> > mailbox attributes, whichever makes more sense.
> 
> Can you add both skip_pcode and IS_SRIOV_VF to the check because these
> really are independent cases.

So perhaps they should be independent patches?

Considering non-mailbox attributes aren't necessarily related to the
problem here, I'm in favor of using skip_pcode for now.

Raag

> > > > Fixes: a7f87deac229 ("drm/xe: Default auto_link_downgrade status
> > > > to
> > > > false")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c | 6 ++++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > > index e5fd0cd537bc..8250aa4620ee 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_sysfs.c
> > > > @@ -259,8 +259,7 @@ auto_link_downgrade_status_show(struct device
> > > > *dev, struct device_attribute *att
> > > >  {
> > > >         struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > > >         struct xe_device *xe = pdev_to_xe_device(pdev);
> > > > -       /* default the auto_link_downgrade status to 0 */
> > > > -       u32 val = 0;
> > > > +       u32 val;
> > > >         int ret;
> > > >  
> > > >         xe_pm_runtime_get(xe);
> > > > @@ -297,6 +296,9 @@ int xe_device_sysfs_init(struct xe_device
> > > > *xe)
> > > >         struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> > > >         int ret;
> > > >  
> > > > +       if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
> > > > +               return 0;
> > > > +
> > > >         if (xe->d3cold.capable) {
> > > >                 ret = sysfs_create_file(&dev->kobj,
> > > > &dev_attr_vram_d3cold_threshold.attr);
> > > >                 if (ret)
> > > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-15  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-11 19:08 [PATCH v1] drm/xe: Don't expose device attributes for VFs Raag Jadav
2025-07-11 19:15 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for " Patchwork
2025-07-11 20:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-07-11 20:49 ` [PATCH v1] " Summers, Stuart
2025-07-12  2:24   ` Raag Jadav
2025-07-14 15:30     ` Summers, Stuart
2025-07-15  3:55       ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-07-12  6:14 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aHXRQKfgVo4rDYBX@black.fi.intel.com \
    --to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
    --cc=Michal.Wajdeczko@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=stuart.summers@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.