From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<aik@amd.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:33:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHatBn28RmpGzGOB@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715063245.1799534-1-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 02:32:37PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> It is to solve the lifecycle issue that vdevice may outlive idevice. It
> is a prerequisite for TIO, to ensure extra secure configurations (e.g.
> TSM Bind/Unbind) against vdevice could be rolled back on idevice unbind,
> so that VFIO could still work on the physical device without surprise.
>
> Changelog:
> v5:
> - Further rebase to iommufd for-next 601b1d0d9395
> - Keep the xa_empty() check in iommufd_fops_release(), update comments
> - Move the *idev next to *viommu for struct iommufd_vdevice
> - Update the description about IOMMUFD_CMD_VDEVICE_ALLOC for lifecycle
> - Remove Baolu's tag for patch 4 because of big changes since v3
> - Add changelog about idev->destroying
> - Adjust line wrappings for tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c
> - Clarify that no testing for tombstoned ID repurposing.
> - Add review tags.
With the patch that I attached in my reply to PATCH-5, sanity works
fine per iommufd's selftest and by testing tegra241-cmdqv in a VM.
So, upon fixing the build break in PATCH-5 (maybe for a v6),
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 6:32 [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] iommufd/viommu: Roll back to use iommufd_object_alloc() for vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] iommufd: Add a pre_destroy() op for objects Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 18:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:09 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 20:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:23 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] iommufd: Rename some shortterm-related identifiers Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 19:33 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHatBn28RmpGzGOB@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.