From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A859128EA72; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 09:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752659377; cv=none; b=tjxctEZiTG6vkDuAmodu/lcKxUObxETqNVH8hOiXGwDcoaOCvkSlov5kzgaPIaJqUVb+Mok/61y2Zlrb56gg3iHaKimSJuQ99g46djygMdm3LNVy+13wT3IN7aw8bzHYThH+GSpX9KPJdZIxUIs4xGrxvOdKyjS61ShpJdfysfU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752659377; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/qH41E0eWXl8rH95/n9qaIle/8nKoTpHI/7/0QnbsZc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LYH6bDqCGrO+fXLkvMVUUQJN/jIIU6nihLFRgkjnpiDDI08nQzlAfqZfIk+0vjVAXFd5iO2Q3g8EpoC1GNr3+d5R2pfVhzpWuGGpaZZJCvSzyT1YYPkRoPf6PhpcaFcmFsrQ9+lR5U0zu/MyWHy7HK7ud4n+qHwT5G1PGDKdSjM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=QuC9zt5q; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="QuC9zt5q" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1752659375; x=1784195375; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=/qH41E0eWXl8rH95/n9qaIle/8nKoTpHI/7/0QnbsZc=; b=QuC9zt5qil6E59nlgfR+5uJ3kXw0LoDv93H5SXeMHXqZp8iZJLMImUQX QBVe6Ncfa6u2LlcVQ6Gvd55Asyje/9Dfakr4o/+D7JnsnaVyQLoCS3Bh6 /uU1h9BA02PB4E+QB23WmBq4Z6cJxz47lVdHpnK9GXecatSnCDbd3Ek6y qpYvTJbZPduZLN45p4Tsi7hY248UXbSDeDHSQHB4VHiAVi/0H85FYzGTt Ab6+Qc9sAiTMdRIp6fozM9xbs4salhQ/Hkk5BbpnOZabWi7SVfWRFl/q8 1bm9xas8LGtEtRudvr5JN2NYPRfxnlw1heTfDgQQGoYpOWz79wYuI84wZ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fuyouHH6QliKyQV1gfzczQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: oBOGunaIRsKG1kU6HJBSMg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11493"; a="57504069" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,315,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="57504069" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2025 02:49:34 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: F315Y0c6RACuOfCcYomDxA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: idn6st+lTIeN5+mu3sJyMQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.16,315,1744095600"; d="scan'208";a="157265083" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2025 02:49:32 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ubylU-0000000Fu1L-2vOD; Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:49:28 +0300 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 12:49:28 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Gustavo Silva Cc: Alex Lanzano , Jonathan Cameron , David Lechner , Nuno =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=E1?= , Andy Shevchenko , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lothar Rubusch Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] iio: imu: bmi270: add support for motion events Message-ID: References: <20250711-bmi270-events-v4-0-53ec7da35046@gmail.com> <20250711-bmi270-events-v4-3-53ec7da35046@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 08:52:41PM -0300, Gustavo Silva wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 10:37:21AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 08:36:03PM -0300, Gustavo Silva wrote: ... > > Is this already documented in ABI? > > > Not yet. Should this have a device-specific ABI entry? I don't know, but what I can say is that change is no-go without documented ABI. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko