From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, jake@hillion.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/ext: Suppress warning in __this_cpu_write() by disabling preemption
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 18:13:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHfPlm2wXPJQQiQn@gpd4> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <imrfubmkw3a6qdznnpounrnen5ituzchwtbjmouocuk77upn67@ljrz32ppyqyr>
On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 09:08:36AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 04:26:23PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 03:36:31PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 03:15:12PM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > >
> > > > The idea is to track the scx callbacks that are invoked with a rq lock held
> > > > and, in those cases, store the locked rq. However, some callbacks may also
> > > > be invoked from an unlocked context, where no rq is locked and in this case
> > > > rq should be NULL.
> > > >
> > > > In the latter case, it's acceptable for preemption to remain enabled, but
> > > > we still want to explicitly set locked_rq = NULL. If during the execution
> > > > of the callback we jump on another CPU, it'd still be in an unlocked state,
> > > > so it's locked_rq is still NULL.
> > >
> > > Right; but doing superfluous NULL stores seems pointless. So better to
> > > avoid the store entirely, rather than making it more expensive and no
> > > less pointless, right?
> >
> > Right, we can definitely avoid rewriting NULL.
> > The following should do the trick.
> >
> > Breno, can you give it a try?
>
> Sure thing. I've tested it and I don't see the warning on my side.
>
> Would you like to me post the patch, probably removing the WARN_ONCE()
> as raised by peterz?
Sure, go ahead. Yes, let's remove the WARN_ON_ONCE().
And thanks Peter for all the suggestions!
-Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-16 16:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-16 12:46 [PATCH] sched/ext: Suppress warning in __this_cpu_write() by disabling preemption Breno Leitao
2025-07-16 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 13:15 ` Andrea Righi
2025-07-16 13:20 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-16 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 13:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 14:26 ` Andrea Righi
2025-07-16 15:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 16:08 ` Breno Leitao
2025-07-16 16:13 ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-07-16 12:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-16 13:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 13:20 ` Andrea Righi
2025-07-16 13:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHfPlm2wXPJQQiQn@gpd4 \
--to=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=jake@hillion.co.uk \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.