From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A73C83F34 for ; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ucTk5-0002fY-GD; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 14:54:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ucR3N-0000VZ-Tk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:01:51 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.129.124]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ucR3M-0001Tj-3x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:01:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1752768106; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=NOdZ6vknGqEKLo+MkxlB5vfqxJiRop2oZTCAk6xk2ok=; b=M/L7+tunZrQK23wqLNP2q55LvkgMlHdCCoKQCsGT3JKWjMNEed/GPgU1ZIFGpouio+Xrju 42CJV3SASIG8u2uu42gIaRBfUxh3kbt5HLuChhyetLQ1PP3KuZcEOULa0PcFL6qU5yg/1p /c7qXiqsvk36kqdwyLYP0of4zjWhVz0= Received: from mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-183-A55RM5NpO3eUfHZS5Cyy5w-1; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 12:01:39 -0400 X-MC-Unique: A55RM5NpO3eUfHZS5Cyy5w-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: A55RM5NpO3eUfHZS5Cyy5w_1752768099 Received: from mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.111]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-02.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54401956057; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.45.225.244]) by mx-prod-int-08.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CE818016F9; Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 18:01:32 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf To: Michael Tokarev Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/27] refresh qemu-img options handling Message-ID: References: <20250531171609.197078-1-mjt@tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.30.177.111 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=170.10.129.124; envelope-from=kwolf@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Am 17.07.2025 um 10:27 hat Michael Tokarev geschrieben: > On 15.07.2025 21:42, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 31.05.2025 um 19:15 hat Michael Tokarev geschrieben: > > > This is another iteration of this patch series, which tries > > > to add missing command-line options, --help output, make it > > > all more or less consistent, etc. > > > > > > I addressed (hopefully) all comments so far, mostly by Kevin. > > > I ended up (so far) with a bit different wording somewhere. > > > > Thanks, I tweaked the wording and style a little bit here and there, > > fixed some qemu-iotests and applied it to the block branch. > > Thank you very much Kevin. It was.. long :) > > I'm not sure I follow - which iotests did you have to tweak? > It shouldn't affect iotests, maybe only if we have some stuff > testing for --help or invalid options? Yes, there were some changed error messages for invalid options that appeared in reference output. Kevin