From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
"open list:KVM PARAVIRT (KVM/paravirt)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kvm: x86: implement PV send_IPI method
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 08:22:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHpmzhaU5JNqhp75@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHplCKOxhBL0O4xr@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025, Chao Gao wrote:
> >> >> >> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >If xAPIC vs. x2APIC is stable when
> >kvm_setup_pv_ipi() runs, maybe key off of that?
>
> But the guest doesn't know if APICv is enabled or even IPI virtualization
> is enabled.
Oh yeah, duh. Given that KVM emulates x2APIC irrespective of hardware support,
and that Linux leans heavily towards x2APIC (thanks MMIO stale data!), my vote
is to leave things as they are.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-18 6:24 [PATCH v1] kvm: x86: implement PV send_IPI method Cindy Lu
2025-07-18 7:52 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-18 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 11:15 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-18 12:19 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 14:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-18 15:15 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHpmzhaU5JNqhp75@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.