From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Romain <jean-philippe.romain@foss.st.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf pfm: Don't force loading of all PMUs
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 13:28:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIKXa4LOIq5MyuS7@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250722013449.146233-1-irogers@google.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 06:34:49PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Force loading all PMUs adds significant cost because DRM and other
> PMUs are loaded, it should also not be required if the pmus__
> functions are used.
>
> Tested by run perf test, in particular the pfm related tests. Also
> `perf list` is identical before and after.
I've also checked it with timing. I'll add this to the commit message.
Before:
$ time ./perf test pfm
54: Test libpfm4 support :
54.1: test of individual --pfm-events : Ok
54.2: test groups of --pfm-events : Ok
103: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok
real 0m8.933s
user 0m1.824s
sys 0m7.122s
After:
$ time ./perf test pfm
54: Test libpfm4 support :
54.1: test of individual --pfm-events : Ok
54.2: test groups of --pfm-events : Ok
103: perf all libpfm4 events test : Ok
real 0m5.259s
user 0m1.793s
sys 0m3.570s
Tested-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/pfm.c | 4 ----
> 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> index 0dacc133ed39..e89395814e88 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/pfm.c
> @@ -47,10 +47,6 @@ int parse_libpfm_events_option(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
> p_orig = p = strdup(str);
> if (!p)
> return -1;
> - /*
> - * force loading of the PMU list
> - */
> - perf_pmus__scan(NULL);
>
> for (q = p; strsep(&p, ",{}"); q = p) {
> sep = p ? str + (p - p_orig - 1) : "";
> --
> 2.50.0.727.gbf7dc18ff4-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-24 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-22 1:34 [PATCH v1] perf pfm: Don't force loading of all PMUs Ian Rogers
2025-07-24 20:28 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-07-25 18:48 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIKXa4LOIq5MyuS7@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jean-philippe.romain@foss.st.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.