All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:55:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aINikVzeWoKpX0_V@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <381cb8d6b28648dbd5772c6bc0b2f1f10c29b53d.camel@redhat.com>

Le Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 08:42:19AM +0200, Gabriele Monaco a écrit :
> On Fri, 2025-07-25 at 01:05 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I assume it's cleaner if I squash it in 7/7 and add a
> Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> and/or
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> 
> Do you agree?

I would prefer to keep the patch standalone because it's already a
logical change that has its own motivation. It's also invasive and
could potentially cause regression (or improvement) so we want to be
able to bisect to that.

Thanks!

-- 
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-25 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-14 13:30 [PATCH v8 0/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] timers: Rename tmigr 'online' bit to 'available' Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] timers: Add the available mask in timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-24 10:20   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] timers: Use scoped_guard when setting/clearing the tmigr available flag Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-24 10:29   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] cgroup/cpuset: Rename update_unbound_workqueue_cpumask() to update_exclusion_cpumasks() Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-24 10:33   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] sched/isolation: Force housekeeping if isolcpus and nohz_full don't leave any Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] cgroup/cpuset: Fail if isolated and nohz_full don't leave any housekeeping Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-24 13:01   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-14 13:30 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] timers: Exclude isolated cpus from timer migration Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-24 23:05   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2025-07-25  6:42     ` Gabriele Monaco
2025-07-25 10:55       ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aINikVzeWoKpX0_V@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=gmonaco@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.