From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/9] perf annotate: Remove __annotation_line__write()
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:42:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIfEogcWn3yvv-Pq@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVG6q37_tVvFo12OCiiE4zu0fqkf_3Z1rmoanVLXR7DOA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 05:20:28PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 12:38 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Get rid of the internal function and convert function arguments into
> > local variables if they are used more than once.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > index 0dd475a744b6dfac..69ee83052396b15e 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> > @@ -1935,24 +1935,26 @@ int annotation_br_cntr_entry(char **str, int br_cntr_nr,
> > return -ENOMEM;
> > }
> >
> > -static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > - bool first_line, bool current_entry, bool change_color, int width,
> > - void *obj, unsigned int percent_type,
> > - int (*obj__set_color)(void *obj, int color),
> > - void (*obj__set_percent_color)(void *obj, double percent, bool current),
> > - int (*obj__set_jumps_percent_color)(void *obj, int nr, bool current),
> > - void (*obj__printf)(void *obj, const char *fmt, ...),
> > - void (*obj__write_graph)(void *obj, int graph))
> > -
> > -{
> > - double percent_max = annotation_line__max_percent(al, percent_type);
> > - int pcnt_width = annotation__pcnt_width(notes),
> > - cycles_width = annotation__cycles_width(notes);
> > +void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > + struct annotation_write_ops *wops)
>
> nit: constify wops? If its const are the local variables worth it?
Sure, I think it's good.
Thanks,
Namhyung
> > +{
> > + bool current_entry = wops->current_entry;
> > + bool change_color = wops->change_color;
> > + double percent_max = annotation_line__max_percent(al, annotate_opts.percent_type);
> > + int width = wops->width;
> > + int pcnt_width = annotation__pcnt_width(notes);
> > + int cycles_width = annotation__cycles_width(notes);
> > bool show_title = false;
> > char bf[256];
> > int printed;
> > -
> > - if (first_line && (al->offset == -1 || percent_max == 0.0)) {
> > + void *obj = wops->obj;
> > + int (*obj__set_color)(void *obj, int color) = wops->set_color;
> > + void (*obj__set_percent_color)(void *obj, double percent, bool current) = wops->set_percent_color;
> > + int (*obj__set_jumps_percent_color)(void *obj, int nr, bool current) = wops->set_jumps_percent_color;
> > + void (*obj__printf)(void *obj, const char *fmt, ...) = wops->printf;
> > + void (*obj__write_graph)(void *obj, int graph) = wops->write_graph;
> > +
> > + if (wops->first_line && (al->offset == -1 || percent_max == 0.0)) {
> > if (notes->branch && al->cycles) {
> > if (al->cycles->ipc == 0.0 && al->cycles->avg == 0)
> > show_title = true;
> > @@ -1966,7 +1968,8 @@ static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotati
> > for (i = 0; i < al->data_nr; i++) {
> > double percent;
> >
> > - percent = annotation_data__percent(&al->data[i], percent_type);
> > + percent = annotation_data__percent(&al->data[i],
> > + annotate_opts.percent_type);
> >
> > obj__set_percent_color(obj, percent, current_entry);
> > if (symbol_conf.show_total_period) {
> > @@ -2115,17 +2118,6 @@ static void __annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotati
> >
> > }
> >
> > -void annotation_line__write(struct annotation_line *al, struct annotation *notes,
> > - struct annotation_write_ops *wops)
> > -{
> > - __annotation_line__write(al, notes, wops->first_line, wops->current_entry,
> > - wops->change_color, wops->width, wops->obj,
> > - annotate_opts.percent_type,
> > - wops->set_color, wops->set_percent_color,
> > - wops->set_jumps_percent_color, wops->printf,
> > - wops->write_graph);
> > -}
> > -
> > int symbol__annotate2(struct map_symbol *ms, struct evsel *evsel,
> > struct arch **parch)
> > {
> > --
> > 2.50.1
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-28 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-25 19:37 [PATCHSET v4 0/9] perf annotate: Support --code-with-type on TUI Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] perf annotate: Rename to __hist_entry__tui_annotate() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:16 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:39 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] perf annotate: Remove __annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:20 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:42 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] perf annotate: Pass annotation_print_data to annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:23 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] perf annotate: Simplify width calculation in annotation_line__write() Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:30 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] perf annotate: Add --code-with-type support for TUI Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:31 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:47 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] perf annotate: Add 'T' hot key to toggle data type display Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:34 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] perf annotate: Show warning when debuginfo is not available Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:38 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] perf annotate: Hide data-type for stack operation and canary Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:44 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-07-25 19:37 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] perf annotate: Add dso__debuginfo() helper Namhyung Kim
2025-07-26 0:46 ` Ian Rogers
2025-07-28 18:54 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIfEogcWn3yvv-Pq@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.