From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com,
mtosatti@redhat.com, kraxel@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] memory: reintroduce BQL-free fine-grained PIO/MMIO
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 09:19:52 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIy--MdAUfMwSL6g@x1.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250801144226.3063e700@fedora>
On Fri, Aug 01, 2025 at 02:42:26PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 17:47:52 -0400
> Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 02:39:29PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > diff --git a/system/memory.c b/system/memory.c
> > > index 5646547940..9a5a262112 100644
> > > --- a/system/memory.c
> > > +++ b/system/memory.c
> > > @@ -2546,6 +2546,12 @@ void memory_region_clear_flush_coalesced(MemoryRegion *mr)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +void memory_region_enable_lockless_io(MemoryRegion *mr)
> > > +{
> > > + mr->lockless_io = true;
>
> /*
> * reentrancy_guard has per device scope, that when enabled
> * will effectively prevent concurrent access to device's IO
> * MemoryRegion(s) by not calling accessor callback.
> *
> * Turn it off for lock-less IO enabled devices, to allow
> * concurrent IO.
> * TODO: remove this when reentrancy_guard becomes per transaction.
> */
>
> would something like this be sufficient?
Looks good to me, thanks!
--
Peter Xu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 12:39 [PATCH v2 0/6] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] memory: reintroduce BQL-free fine-grained PIO/MMIO Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 21:47 ` Peter Xu
2025-07-31 8:15 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-01 12:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-01 13:19 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] acpi: mark PMTIMER as unlocked Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] hpet: switch to fain-grained device locking Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] hpet: move out main counter read into a separate block Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] hpet: make main counter read lock-less Igor Mammedov
2025-07-30 22:15 ` Peter Xu
2025-07-31 8:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-07-31 14:02 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-01 8:06 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-01 13:32 ` Peter Xu
2025-07-30 12:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] kvm: i386: irqchip: take BQL only if there is an interrupt Igor Mammedov
2025-07-31 19:24 ` Peter Xu
2025-08-01 8:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-08-01 13:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-01 10:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-01 12:47 ` Igor Mammedov
2025-07-31 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] Reinvent BQL-free PIO/MMIO Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aIy--MdAUfMwSL6g@x1.local \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.