From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
"robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com" <robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"yong.wu@mediatek.com" <yong.wu@mediatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@gmail.com" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"vdumpa@nvidia.com" <vdumpa@nvidia.com>,
"jonathanh@nvidia.com" <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
"rafael@kernel.org" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"patches@lists.linux.dev" <patches@lists.linux.dev>,
"Jaroszynski, Piotr" <pjaroszynski@nvidia.com>,
"Sethi, Vikram" <vsethi@nvidia.com>,
"helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>,
"etzhao1900@gmail.com" <etzhao1900@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 11:45:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ+AP18ucw3Jb6QO@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB52769ACDFED7201CE282FE3C8C34A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 08:55:28AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 6:59 AM
> > On the other hand, the iommu_get_domain_for_dev() API always returns the
> > group->domain pointer, and several IOMMMU drivers call this API in their
> > attach_dev callback functions to get the currently attached domain for a
> > device, which will be broken for the recovery case mentioned above:
> > 1. core asks the driver to attach dev from blocked to group->domain
> > 2. driver attaches dev from group->domain to group->domain
>
> the 2nd bullet implies that a driver may skip the operation by noting that
> old domain is same as the new one?
Drivers uses iommu_get_domain_for_dev() to get the "old domain".
But during a reset, it doesn't return the actual old domain that
should be blocked domain but returns the group->domain.
Driver needs the actual domain (blocked) in that case because it
handles the requests from iommu_dev_reset_prepare/done().
> > So, iommu_get_domain_for_dev() should check the gdev flag and return the
> > blocked domain if the flag is set. But the caller of this API could hold
> > the group->mutex already or not, making it difficult to add the lock.
> >
> > Introduce a new iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper to be used by
> > those drivers in a context that is already under the protection of the
> > group->mutex, e.g. those attach_dev callback functions. And roll out the
> > new helper to all the existing IOMMU drivers.
>
> iommu_get_domain_for_dev() is also called outside of attach_dev
> callback functions, e.g. malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(). and the returned
> info according to the attached domain might be saved in static
> structures, e.g.:
>
> ms->mmu_prefetch_pgsize = malidp_get_pgsize_bitmap(mp);
>
> would that cause weird issues when blocking domain is returned
> though one may not expect reset to happen at that point?
We aren't changing the iommu_get_domain_for_dev(). So, it should
be used exclusively for functions that are outside group->mutex,
like this one, i.e. they should still get the group->domain v.s.
the blocked domain.
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-15 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-11 22:59 [PATCH v3 0/5] Disable ATS via iommu during PCI resets Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] iommu: Lock group->mutex in iommu_deferred_attach Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:09 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:27 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 8:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:26 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:17 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 18:09 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 18:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] iommu: Pass in gdev to __iommu_device_set_domain Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:18 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:29 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] iommu: Add iommu_get_domain_for_dev_locked() helper Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:28 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 18:48 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 2:09 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 8:55 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 18:45 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2025-08-21 8:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 14:41 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-31 23:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 14:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-18 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-18 23:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 5:09 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 12:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-19 17:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-21 15:22 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 18:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 5:11 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 8:11 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-21 13:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 9:45 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-22 13:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] iommu: Introduce iommu_dev_reset_prepare() and iommu_dev_reset_done() Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 5:49 ` Baolu Lu
2025-08-15 20:10 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-15 9:14 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-08-15 19:45 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-11 22:59 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] pci: Suspend iommu function prior to resetting a device Nicolin Chen
2025-08-19 14:12 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-19 21:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-20 3:18 ` Ethan Zhao
2025-08-22 6:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-21 13:07 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 6:35 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-22 14:08 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-22 18:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 12:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 15:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-08-28 18:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-28 19:35 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ+AP18ucw3Jb6QO@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=etzhao1900@gmail.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pjaroszynski@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.clark@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=vdumpa@nvidia.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yong.wu@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.