Re: [PATCH v8 00/30] TDX KVM selftests

[Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025, Sagi Shahar wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2025 at 3:53 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2025, Rick P Edgecombe wrote:
> > > But Sean, if you want to save some time I think we can just accelerate this
> > > other reviewing. As far as new-fangled features, having this upstream is
> > > important even for that, because we are currently having to keep these tests
> > > plus follow on tests in sync across various development branches. So yea, it's
> > > time to get this over the line.
> >
> > Yes please.  The unspoken threat in my response is that at some point I will just
> > start NAKing KVM TDX patches :-D
> 
> I'm making good progress and the massive refactor is mostly complete.
> I believe I should have the patches ready to review next week.
> 
> I'm also thinking that it would be easier if I split the series in 2
> or possibly 3 patchset. The first one including the setup code and the
> basic lifecycle test and then the rest of the tests with possibly the
> guest_memfd tests in a separate series. What do you think?

Yes, please.  Even if we end up having to tweak a few APIs when the fancier tests
come along, I think it'll be easier and faster overall to hammer out the core
support first.