From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>,
Aditya Kumar Singh <quic_adisi@quicinc.com>,
Rameshkumar Sundaram <quic_ramess@quicinc.com>,
Roopni Devanathan <quic_rdevanat@quicinc.com>,
"open list:MARVELL MWIFIEX WIRELESS DRIVER"
<linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] wifi: mwifiex: use vmalloc_array() to simplify code
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 09:24:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aJ2BJKAnFuJ-xIjs@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <272c9a0f-1e95-4c7c-9b84-a6b564d9e2bd@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:35:45AM -0700, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 8/12/2025 6:48 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 09:32:18PM +0800, Qianfeng Rong wrote:
> >> Remove array_size() calls and replace vmalloc() with vmalloc_array() to
> >> simplify the code.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@vivo.com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c | 4 ++--
> >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> >> index 3498743d5ec0..fb4183ff02a9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/cfg80211.c
> >> @@ -4673,8 +4673,8 @@ int mwifiex_init_channel_scan_gap(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
> >> * additional active scan request for hidden SSIDs on passive channels.
> >> */
> >> adapter->num_in_chan_stats = 2 * (n_channels_bg + n_channels_a);
> >> - adapter->chan_stats = vmalloc(array_size(sizeof(*adapter->chan_stats),
> >> - adapter->num_in_chan_stats));
> >> + adapter->chan_stats = vmalloc_array(adapter->num_in_chan_stats,
> >> + sizeof(*adapter->chan_stats));
> >
> > n_channels_bg is 14
> > n_channels_a is either 0 or 31 depending on if we're using BAND_A.
> > sizeof(*adapter->chan_stats) is 10.
> >
> > So we're either allocating 280 or 900 bytes, which is quite small. We
> > should just use kmalloc_array() instead of vmalloc_array().
>
> Should transition from v*() to k*() be separate from transition from *malloc()
> to *malloc_array()?
It doesn't make sense to split this up. The right thing is kcalloc().
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-14 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-12 13:32 [PATCH 0/5] net: use vmalloc_array() to simplify code Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [PATCH 1/5] ethtool: " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 16:28 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-08-12 16:28 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2025-08-12 16:34 ` Paul Menzel
2025-08-14 4:05 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-14 6:28 ` Paul Menzel
2025-08-14 6:41 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 20:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-12 20:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-13 7:00 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-13 7:00 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [PATCH 2/5] nfp: flower: " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [PATCH 3/5] ppp: use vmalloc_array() to simplify Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] wifi: ath5k: use vmalloc_array() to simplify code Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:32 ` [PATCH 5/5] wifi: mwifiex: " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 13:48 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-12 14:13 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-12 14:31 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-13 6:52 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-13 9:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-13 18:35 ` Jeff Johnson
2025-08-14 6:24 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2025-08-12 20:48 ` [PATCH 0/5] net: " Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-12 20:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jakub Kicinski
2025-08-13 1:53 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-13 1:53 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-13 6:49 ` Qianfeng Rong
2025-08-13 6:49 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Qianfeng Rong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aJ2BJKAnFuJ-xIjs@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_adisi@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_ramess@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rdevanat@quicinc.com \
--cc=rongqianfeng@vivo.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.